Ethnic Tensions in Rwanda
- This case study of Prescribe Topic: Conflict and Intervention focuses on the Rwandan Genocide of 1994.
- Over 100 days between April and June, approximately 800,000 to over one million people-mainly Tutsi civilians-were brutally murdered by Hutu extremists.
- This killing spree, faster and more intense than any genocide of the 20th century, surpassed those in Cambodia and Bosnia and occurred at five times the speed of the Holocaust.
- While much of the international community remained unaware or inactive, Rwanda was devastated.
- The massacre was not a spontaneous act of violence but a calculated strategy by a ruling elite desperate to retain power.
Rising of ethnic tensions: the colonial legacy
- After World War I, Rwanda was handed to Belgium after having been colonized by Germany, under a League of Nations mandate.
- The Belgians reinforced the existing social hierarchy, favoring the minority Tutsi-deemed racially superior based on pseudo-scientific beliefs-over the majority Hutu.
- This preference entrenched an ethnic divide that had previously been more fluid and socio-economic than rigid or racial.
- Belgian colonialism propagated the myth that the Tutsi were a racially distinct, superior people-taller, more intelligent, and better suited to rule.
- These ideas, rooted in 19th-century European racial theory, shaped future ethnic ideology in Rwanda and were later weaponized by Hutu extremists in the 1994 genocide.
Tutsi “superiority”
- European colonial powers, especially Belgium, applied 19th-century racial theories to Rwanda. They were influenced by the Hamitic Hypothesis, a now-discredited theory that claimed the Tutsi were of Caucasian descent, coming from the northeast (possibly Ethiopia or Egypt).
- Colonizers believed the Tutsi were naturally more intelligent, refined, and suited to rule. Belgian anthropologists and missionaries reinforced this idea, pointing to the Tutsi’s taller height, lighter skin, and narrower features as proof of “racial superiority.”
- These physical differences were used to justify giving Tutsi elites special privileges in education, government jobs, and church leadership.
- This deepened the ethnic divide and embedded false racial hierarchies into Rwandan society.
Belgian colonial rule in Rwanda
- Direct rule and exploitation
- Belgium imposed direct rule, forcing labor and heavy taxation.
- Rwanda’s fertile land was exploited for cash crops like coffee.
- Tutsi elites acted as intermediaries, which increased resentment among the Hutu.
- The Hutu carried most of the exploitation but were politically marginalized.
- Ethnically segregated education
- Tutsi children received superior education, usually in French.
- Hutu children were restricted to vocational training.
- Christianity was made compulsory for Tutsi elites, further raising their status.
- This reinforced Belgian control through religious and administrative loyalty.
- 1933 census and identity cards
- People were officially classified as Tutsi, Hutu, or Twa.
- What had once been flexible social categories became rigid ethnic labels.
- The system institutionalized discrimination and created conditions for future mass violence.
- The Twa were Rwanda’s original inhabitants, a small pygmy ethnic group traditionally living as hunter-gatherers.
- Marginalized by both Hutu and Tutsi, they represent about 1% of the population.
Towards independence
- UN trust territory after WWII
- Rwanda became a UN trust territory after the war.
- Belgium was criticized for failing to prepare Rwanda for independence.
- In the 1950s, anti-colonial movements grew and Belgium shifted its support to the Hutu majority after decades of favoring the Tutsi.
- This reversal intensified ethnic tensions and directly led to the 1959 Hutu Revolution, which set the stage for the 1994 genocide.
- Independence and Revolution (1959-62)
- Rwanda gained independence from Belgium in July 1962 after a period of violent conflict.
- In 1957, Hutu leaders founded PARMEHUTU to challenge Tutsi dominance.
- After King Mutara III’s death in 1959 and a violent incident involving a Hutu leader, unrest spread.
- PARMEHUTU uprisings targeted the Tutsi elite, overthrew the monarchy, and installed a Hutu provisional government.
- This was Rwanda’s first major ethnic conflict, with 10,000–100,000 Tutsi killed.
- Exile and rebel groups
- Facing massacres and persecution, thousands of Tutsi fled to neighboring countries, especially Uganda.
- These exiles became known as the “children of ’59.”
- Many formed armed groups, most importantly the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
- The RPF later played a central role in the events of 1994.
- Violence during this time was extreme, with rivers filled with bodies foreshadowing the genocide to come.
What were PARMEHUTU and RFP?
- These groups should be labeled as political movements more than as political parties. Rwanda gained independence in 1962, but the political scenario was extremely unstable.
- PARMEHUTU (Party for the Emancipation of the Hutu People) was founded in 1957 by Hutu intellectuals, it was explicitly pro-Hutu and called for majority rule, aiming to end Tutsi political dominance that had been reinforced under colonialism.
- PARMEHUTU led the 1959 Hutu revolution, deposed the Tutsi monarchy, and came to power after independence in 1962, installing a Hutu-dominated government.
- RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front) was formed in 1987 by Tutsi exiles (many were refugees from the 1959 revolution) mostly living in Uganda.
- The RPF was both a political party and a military force, aiming to secure the right of return for Tutsi refugees and establish a unified, non-ethnic Rwanda.
- It became the key opposition to the Hutu regime and eventually ended the 1994 genocide by militarily defeating the government and taking control of the country.


