Background
- Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal (1933–1939) fundamentally redefined the U.S. government’s role in the economy.
- For the first time, the federal government became responsible for social welfare, regulation, and employment.
- While many Americans credited Roosevelt with saving capitalism, others accused him of undermining democracy or doing too little for social justice.
- Opposition from conservatives, business leaders, populists, and even the Supreme Court shaped the limits of the New Deal and its eventual legacy.
Critics from the Political Right
- Business and Conservative Opposition
- Industrial and financial elites resented government interference in the economy.
- The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Liberty League (1934) denounced the New Deal as “socialist” and unconstitutional.
- Critics argued that Roosevelt’s regulations (e.g., NRA, Wagner Act) discouraged investment and weakened free enterprise.
- Constitutional Concerns:
- Conservatives believed Roosevelt had exceeded his authority by expanding executive power and centralizing control.
- The Supreme Court struck down several key programs, including the National Industrial Recovery Act (1935) and Agricultural Adjustment Act (1936), ruling them unconstitutional.
Critics from the Political Left
- Socialist and Populist Movements
- Many radicals believed the New Deal failed to redistribute wealth or challenge corporate power.
- Socialist and Communist parties accused Roosevelt of preserving capitalism rather than replacing it.
- Populist Demagogues
- Huey Long (Louisiana): Proposed the “Share Our Wealth” plan, advocating confiscation of large fortunes to guarantee every family a $5,000 income.
- Dr. Francis Townsend: Proposed old-age pensions funded by a national sales tax, a precursor to Social Security.
- Father Charles Coughlin: A radio priest who blamed bankers and promoted anti-Semitic and isolationist rhetoric; his movement drew millions of listeners before being discredited.
Huey Long and the Supreme Court as New Deal Opponents
- Huey Long (“Kingfish”)
- Governor and Senator from Louisiana, Long accused Roosevelt of betraying the poor.
- His “Share Our Wealth” clubs attracted millions of members before his assassination in 1935, removing a major populist rival.
- His ideas pressured Roosevelt to adopt more redistributive policies in the Second New Deal (1935), particularly the Social Security Act and Wealth Tax Act.
- Supreme Court Resistance
- The Court struck down early New Deal measures (NIRA and AAA) as overreach of federal power.
- Roosevelt responded with the Court-Packing Plan (1937), an attempt to appoint up to six additional justices to secure support for his policies.
- Though the plan failed politically, subsequent retirements allowed Roosevelt to reshape the Court, which began upholding New Deal reforms thereafter.
The Role of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Debate
- Early Opposition
- In Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935), the Court ruled the NIRA unconstitutional, citing violation of the separation of powers.
- In U.S. v. Butler (1936), the Court struck down the AAA for federal overreach into agriculture.
- Shift in Stance (“The Switch in Time”)
- In 1937, Justice Owen Roberts shifted votes in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, upholding minimum wage laws and signaling judicial acceptance of New Deal principles.
- Outcome
- The Court’s resistance reinforced checks on executive authority but also compelled Roosevelt to seek constitutional justification for economic management.
Political Impact of the New Deal
- Transformation of the Democratic Party
- The New Deal created a new “Democratic coalition” uniting urban workers, farmers, African Americans, intellectuals, and the South.
- Marked the beginning of modern liberalism and a realignment of U.S. politics lasting until the 1960s.
- Expansion of Executive Power
- The presidency became the center of national leadership, setting policy through federal agencies and emergency powers.
- The “Imperial Presidency” concept emerged from Roosevelt’s expansion of the administrative state.
- Rise of the Welfare State
- The federal government assumed responsibility for employment, social security, and economic regulation, fundamentally altering its relationship with citizens.
- Organize essays by critics (right, left, judicial) and impacts (political, economic, social).
- Show continuity and change. The New Deal didn’t overthrow capitalism but redefined it.
- Include the Court-Packing Plan and Huey Long as representative challenges.
- Treating critics as a single bloc. Distinguish between ideological (left/right) and institutional (Supreme Court)opposition.
- Ignoring the long-term structural legacy i.e. political realignment and regulatory framework.
- Knowledge and Ideology: When policies blend opposing ideas i.e. capitalism and social reform, how do we decide whether they represent compromise or transformation?


