Consolidation and maintenance: Use of force
Purges
- After becoming the Soviet Union’s supreme leader (vozhd) in 1929, Stalin began consolidating his power using purges, a method with Leninist precedents.
- Stalin’s purges formally began in 1932, with the trial of the Ryutin group, who openly opposed him.
- The Ryutin affair culminated in a massive purge of the Communist Party membership: between 1933 and 1934, over a third of members (about one million people) were expelled for suspected disloyalty.
The Ryutin Affair (1932)
- Ryutin Affair (1932): led by Martemyan Ryutin, ex-Party official critical of Stalin
- Authored “Stalin and the Crisis of the Proletarian Dictatorship” (200 pages) calling for Stalin’s removal
- Ryutin Platform: supporters circulated the document within the Party
- Stalin demanded execution, but Politburo blocked it
- Ryutin got 10 years in prison; associates were expelled from the Party
- Marked a precursor to wider purges
- The Ryutin affair shows two important issues: first, that in the early years of Stalin there were still channels to voice discontent.
- Secondly, that Stalin had to compromise with other Party members (ten years sentence instead of execution).
- This would change in the upcoming years, leaving Stalin as the sole decision maker in the USSR.
From Administrative Purges to Systematic Terror
- Early purges were administrative, non-violent: party card inspections expelled “suspicious” members
- Loss of membership meant loss of jobs, housing, rations, enforcing compliance through pressure
- 1934 turning point: purges escalated into systematic terror
- Targets expanded to political enemies, colleagues, and Party members
- Escalation driven by complex factors (see historiography)
- Why did purges become harsher after 1934?
- Alec Nove: Stalin’s harshness stemmed from enemies created by forced modernization
- Robert Service: Stalin had a “gross personality disorder”, shaped by Georgian roots and Bolshevik violence
- For Stalin and his circle, terror was a normal, necessary tool to preserve the Revolution and control
The NKVD
- 1933–34: Stalin centralized security under the NKVD (People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs), uniting police, secret police, border guards, and labour camps
- NKVD reported directly to Stalin, controlling surveillance, arrests, and enforcement
- Special military tribunals bypassed normal legal processes
- Vague crimes like “counter-revolutionary activity” enabled arbitrary arrests
- Labels such as “enemy of the people” created constant insecurity
- Reign of fear: suspicion and fabricated charges suppressed opposition
- Families of the accused faced isolation, job loss, ration cuts, reinforcing obedience
- The Whisperers by Orlando Figes
- Orlando Figes, The Whisperers (2007): Stalin’s terror invaded private life
- Families whispered at home, fearing arrest for casual remarks or associations
- Parents taught children silence even under torture
- Denunciation culture: people reported colleagues, friends, and relatives to the NKVD
- Trust collapsed as betrayal was incentivized
- Figes: “The Soviet regime turned the family into an instrument of the state.”
The Kirov Murder and the Great Purge
- 1 Dec 1934: Sergei Kirov assassinated by Leonid Nikolaev
- Official story: crime of passion, but many suspected Stalin’s involvement
- Kirov seen as a rival: charismatic, respected, critical of Stalin
- His death provided the pretext for the Great Purge
- Removal of Kirov eliminated a potential rallying point for opposition
- Within hours of Kirov’s death, Stalin enacted the Decree Against Terrorist Acts, which gave the NKVD sweeping powers to execute “enemies” without standard trials.
- Thousands were arrested or executed, including prominent old Bolsheviks like Zinoviev and Kamenev.
- Stalin claimed these were Trotskyite conspirators, but the real objective was eliminating all potential dissent and consolidating absolute authority.
The Kirov Affair
- 1 Dec 1934: Sergei Kirov assassinated by Leonid Nikolaev
- Official story: jealousy motive, backed by coerced confessions
- Led to the 1st December Decree: swift arrest/execution of “terrorists”
- Yagoda theory: NKVD chief may have arranged killing to remove a rival
- Stalin theory (most compelling): ordered assassination due to Kirov’s popularity, charisma, and criticism of his policies
- At 17th Party Congress, Kirov reportedly got more votes than Stalin, fueling rivalry fears
The Great Purge/The Great Terror (1936-1938)
- After Kirov’s death: purges reached unprecedented scale
- Of 1,996 delegates (17th Party Congress, 1934), 1,108 executed within 3 years
- Of 139 Central Committee members, all but 41 executed
- Decree Against Terrorist Acts (1934) became tool for political murder
- Show trials staged to expose “enemies”
- Old Bolsheviks Kamenev and Zinoviev forced into public confessions
- These trials set precedent, legitimizing wider purges and spreading terror
- Accusations were framed in vague ideological terms like “Left,” “Right,” “Trotskyite,” or “Centre,” regardless of their actual beliefs.
- These fluid and invented categories allowed Stalin to target virtually anyone, especially old Bolsheviks.
- As historian Stephen Kotkin notes, Stalin conflated political labels with betrayal, making ideological purity a matter of loyalty to him personally.
- This rhetorical strategy blurred truth and fiction, transforming past ideological allies into current “traitors.”
- Purges were not new in the USSR. They had been used by Lenin and systematically by Stalin.
- The difference now was the target of these purges: high profile Bolsheviks, old timers of the Revolution, people that had been close to Lenin.
- The Communist Party no longer had a will separate from Stalin’s, it became indistinguishable from the dictator himself.
- Why the Victims Confessed
- Confessions driven by coercion, psychological pressure, and disillusionment
- Party denunciation caused existential crises for lifelong Bolsheviks
- Stalin twisted Marxist morality, making confession seem loyal
- Bukharin justified submission as serving the greater good: “the whole country stands behind Stalin”
- Stalin destroyed opponents physically and mentally, bending even final thoughts to state dogma
The Right Opposition and the Climax of the Great Purge
- After crushing the Left, Stalin targeted the Right Opposition (Bukharin, Rykov, Tomsky)
- Politburo resistance delayed action until Stalin replaced Yagoda with Yezhov, a harsher NKVD chief
- Marked the shift to mass industrial scale terror
- Bukharin’s 1938 trial: fabricated charges (espionage, sabotage, plotting Stalin’s death) served propaganda
- After 1937, purges turned inward with Yagoda himself accused and executed
- Terror became self replicating, sparing no one
- Purges were a strategy to consolidate absolute power, not mere security measures
- Tools: public trials, forced confessions, mass executions
- Result: USSR ruled not by law or ideology, but by fear
- Stalin’s Great Purge/Great Terror
- Intentionalist view: Purge was Stalin’s deliberate strategy to consolidate power, eliminate rivals, instil fear, and enforce loyalty
- Structuralist view: Purge stemmed from systemic dysfunction, bureaucratic rivalries, local overreach, and ideological zeal, with Stalin’s control less than absolute
- Evaluation: Intentionalist view criticized as overly simplistic and personality-focused; structuralist view criticized for downplaying Stalin’s agency and overcomplicating events
The Military Purges and the Height of Stalin’s Terror
- 1937: Stalin purged the Red Army, fearing it as a threat
- Marshal Tukhachevsky and top generals executed on false espionage charges
- Within 18 months, 35,000 officers removed, over half the corps
- Navy and Air Force leadership also decimated
- Purges extended to Soviet republics, dismantling local autonomy (e.g., 80% of Georgian party secretaries dismissed)
- Under Yezhov’s NKVD, terror became systemic with execution quotas
- Butovo near Moscow, 20,000 shot and buried in mass graves
- Citizens lived under constant surveillance, often betraying family to survive
- Result: society reshaped by fear, suspicion, and submission
- According to post-Soviet archival research (Applebaum, Conquest), by 1939 approximately 18 million people had been arrested, deported, or executed.
- At least one million were shot, millions more perished in gulag camps.
- Nearly every Soviet family lost someone.
- The terror inflicted long-lasting trauma on society and institutionalized a culture of fear.
- The Panopticon
- Panopticon: Bentham’s prison design, one guard can watch all inmates unseen
- Foucault, Discipline and Punish (1975): metaphor for modern surveillance and discipline
- Power works through constant visibility and threat of observation
- Individuals self-regulate because they may be watched at any time
- Symbolizes shift from sovereign power to diffuse, normalized control
- Modern power shapes behavior invisibly, without overt repression
- What methods did Stalin use in the early administrative purges, and how did they differ from the later systematic terror after 1934?
- How did the creation of the NKVD and the introduction of vague crimes like “counter-revolutionary activity” expand Stalin’s control over Soviet society?
- Why was the murder of Sergei Kirov in 1934 such an important turning point in the escalation of Stalin’s purges?
- How did the show trials and the targeting of both Left and Right Opposition figures serve Stalin’s broader political aims?
- What impact did the military purges and mass executions under Yezhov have on Soviet society, governance, and later military performance?


