IB English HL Essay (HLE) Grading Breakdown & Expanded Feedback (20/20)
Criterion A: Knowledge & Interpretation (5/5)
- Depth of insight & interpretation
- The essay does more than just describe Griffiths’ photographs, it analyzes their impact, artistic techniques, and historical relevance.
- It moves beyond surface-level discussion by linking Griffiths’ work to broader themes of war propaganda, media influence, and moral corruption.
- Engagement with the text & global significance
- Each paragraph incorporates detailed discussion of Griffiths’ specific images, ensuring close textual analysis.
- The essay connects Griffiths’ anti-war message to real-world contexts, making the argument more relevant and sophisticated.
- Balancing Close & Wide Analysis
- The essay zooms in on specific photographs, explaining their composition, angles, lighting, and framing in depth.
- It zooms out to discuss how these choices reflect Griffiths’ wider message about war’s brutality and dehumanization.
How It Could Lose Marks:
- If the essay only summarized Griffiths’ photos without offering deeper interpretations.
- If the essay lacked historical/political context, making the analysis feel isolated from real-world implications.
Criterion B: Analysis & Evaluation (5/5)
- Depth of Analysis of Literary & Visual Techniques
- The essay dissects Griffiths’ use of visual composition, contrast, perspective, and lighting.
- It does not just state what the images depict but how Griffiths manipulates visual elements to create meaning.
- Evaluation of Meaning & Purpose
- The essay thoroughly examines Griffiths’ intentions, considering how his work opposes war glorification and subverts traditional war photography.
- It engages with multiple interpretations, recognizing how war’s paradox (violence vs. compassion) adds complexity to his message.
- Consideration of Alternative Perspectives
- The essay acknowledges that Griffiths portrays both American soldiers and Vietnamese victims as casualties of war, rather than framing the conflict as purely one-sided.
- The discussion of soldiers’ psychological trauma and moral corruption adds nuance, rather than painting them as villains, it presents them as victims of a larger war machine.
How It Could Lose Marks:
- If the analysis were too simplistic, focusing only on the literal content of the images.
- If the evaluation failed to explore Griffiths’ artistic and political choices.
Criterion C: Focus & Organization (5/5)
- Clear & Logical Structure


