Taxes
Mandatory payments made by households and firms, collected by governments.
- Poverty, income and wealth inequalities are one of the most pressing issues in contemporary economics.
- In order to deal with these issues, governments often need to intervene.
- One of the most common ways for governments intervention to reduce poverty and income and wealth inequalities is through taxation.
Remember that there are two main forms of government taxes:
- Direct taxes: paid directly to the government by individuals or organisations.
- Indirect taxes: applied to goods and services, paid indirectly by consumers through the price of goods, including:
- Taxes on spending.
- Excise taxes.
- Custom duties.
Direct taxes
Direct tax
Tax paid to the government directly by the taxpayer (individual).
There are three main types of direct taxes:
- Personal income taxes: taxes levied on an individual's income from factors of production (rent, wages, interests, profits).
- Corporate income taxes: taxes imposed on a company's profits after deducting expenses and allowances.
- Wealth taxes: taxes on the market value of an individual's assets, such as property, investments, and savings.
People often confuse the income tax on investment earnings (such as interest or dividends) with wealth taxes on the value of the investments themselves. While income tax applies to the returns generated from investments, wealth taxes are levied on the total market value of the assets owned.
Progressive, regressive and proportional taxes
Taxes can be differentiated by the following characteristics:
- Progressive taxes:
- The higher the income, the higher the proportion of income paid as tax will be.
- For example:
- If you make less that USD 50,000 a year, you pay 10% of income tax.
- If you make between USD 50,000 and USD 100,000 a year, you pay 20% of income tax.
- If you make more than USD 100,000, you pay 50% income tax.
- Regressive taxes:
- As income increases, the proportion of income paid as tax lowers.
- For example:
- If you make less that USD 50,000 a year, you pay 50% of income tax.
- If you make between USD 50,000 and USD 100,000 a year, you pay 20% of income tax.
- If you make more than USD 100,000, you pay 10% income tax.
- Proportional taxes:
- As income increases, the proportion of income paid as tax will stay constant.
- For example:
- If you make less that USD 50,000 a year, you pay 20% of income tax.
- If you make between USD 50,000 and USD 100,000 a year, you pay 20% of income tax.
- If you make more than USD 100,000, you pay 20% income tax.
The table below illustrates the three different tax systems, two income levels, and the amount of tax paid at each tax system.
| Income 1($) | Income 2($) | Percentage of Tax Paid on Income 1 | Amount of Tax Paid for Income 1 in $ | Percentage of Tax Paid on Income 2 | Amount of Tax Paid for Income 2 in $ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportional | 20000 | 50000 | 10% | 2000$ | 10% | 5000$ |
| Progressive | 20000 | 50000 | 10% | 2000$ | 20% | 10000$ |
| Regressive | 20000 | 50000 | 10% | 2000$ | 5% | 2500$ |
Progressive taxes are often chosen by governments to address income inequalities. This is because of their redistributive effects:
- Those in low-incomes pay little taxes, increasing their disposable income to increase their human capital and wealth.
- Contrarily, those in high-incomes pay a lot of taxes, which governments can use to support those in low-incomes through benefits such as direct payments, financing education...
- Hence, through a progressive tax system, the government redistributes income and wealth from the rich to the poor, making it a key tool in addressing poverty and inequalities.
On the other hand, proportional taxes are often praised for their simplicity but criticised for not addressing poverty and inequalities. While some consider them to be more equitable, other argue that it is more equitable to have progressive taxes to counteract the advantages to building income and wealth that high-income earners have over low-income earners.
Indirect taxes
Indirect taxes
Taxes imposed on goods and services, paid to the government by sellers but ultimately borne by consumers.
- Indirect taxes are levied on goods and services rather than on income or wealth.
- Even though producers transfer indirect taxes to the government, they are typically paid by consumers through higher prices.
- Common types include value-added tax (VAT), excise duties on specific goods (e.g., alcohol, tobacco), and customs duties on imported goods.
The regressive nature of indirect taxes
Common MistakeIt is a very common mistake to believe that indirect taxes are a form of proportional taxes.
- Indirect taxes are fixed, at a certain rate (20%, USD 2 per kg...) for a certain product.
- As a result, to acquire that good, consumers with lower incomes have to pay a higher proportion of their income in indirect tax than consumers with higher incomes.
- Therefore, indirect taxes are regressive, and worsen income distribution.
While indirect taxes can disproportionately affect lower-income groups, they are often used to fund essential public services.
Calculating direct and indirect taxes(HL only)
Marginal and average tax rate
Average tax rate
The average total proportion of income paid as tax.
Marginal tax rate
The percentage of tax paid on the next dollar earned.
To understand how income taxes are calculated, we need to look at:
- Average tax rate: found by dividing tax paid by total income
- Marginal tax rate: found by dividing tax on the next dollar by the next dollar of income.
Income taxes in progressive tax systems
When calculating the total income tax paid in progressive tax systems, we calculate the tax paid on each income bracket. The example below illustrates how this is done:
ExampleCalculating total tax paid with marginal tax rates
Consider the following income tax brackets, in a progressive tax system:
| Income Level($) | Marginal Tax Rate(%) | Tax Paid($) | Cumulative Tax Paid($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10000 | 10 | 1000 | 1000 |
| 10001-30000 | 20 | 4000 | 5000 |
| 30001 and more | 30 | 4500 | 9500 |
- Let's say a person earns \$45,000, and we need to calculate the income tax they will need to pay based on the given tax brackets
- For the first \$10,000 of income, the marginal tax rate is 10%:
- Tax paid: \$10,000 × 0.01 (10%) = \$1,000 paid.
- Subtract the first $10,000 from the total income (since it's already taxed):
- \$45,000 - \$10,000 = $35,000 left to tax.
- For the next \$20,000 (from \$10,001 to \$30,000), the marginal tax rate is 20%:
- Tax paid: \$20,000 × 0.2 (20%) = \$4,000 of tax paid.
- So far, the total tax paid is:
- \$1,000 (first \$10,000) + \$4,000 (next \$20,000) = \$5,000 of tax paid.
- For the remaining \$15,000 (from \$30,001 to \$45,000), the marginal tax rate is 30%:
- Tax paid: \$15,000 × 0.3 (30%) = \$4,500
- So far, the total tax paid is:
- \$5,000 + \$4,500 = \$9,500
- For the first \$10,000 of income, the marginal tax rate is 10%:
- Therefore a total of 9500\$ of tax will be paid for an income of 45000\$.
After calculating the final tax paid on the total income, we can calculate the average tax rate by using the following formula:
$$\text{Average Tax Rate (ATR)} = \frac{\text{Total Tax Paid}}{\text{Total Income}} \times 100$$
Continuing with our example above:
$$\text{Average Tax Rate (ATR)} = \frac{\text{Total Tax Paid}}{\text{Total Income}} \times 100 = \frac{9500}{45000} \times 100 = 21.11\%$$
Calculations for indirect taxes
Lets say that after paying its income tax of 9500$, the disposable income left for the individual from our example above is:
$$45000\ \text{\$} - 9500\ \text{\$} = 35500\ \text{\$}$$
Let's say this person bought some goods and services that have an indirect tax of 12%. How do we find how much indirect tax this person paid?
ExampleCalculating indirect tax paid
- As mentioned before, the total amount spent (including the 12% indirect tax!) is $35,500.
- We need to calculate how much was spent before tax and how much of this total represents indirect tax.
Step 1: Define the spending before tax
- Let Z represent the spending before tax (excluding the 12% tax). Since a 12% tax is added to this spending, the total amount spent can be written as:
$$Z + 0.12 \times Z = 35,500$$
- Combine terms:
$$1.12Z = 35,500$$
- Solve for $Z$:
$$Z = \frac{35,500}{1.12} = 31,696.43$$
Step 2: Calculate the indirect tax paid
The indirect tax is the difference between the total spending and the spending before tax:
$$\text{Indirect Tax} = 35,500 - 31,696.43 = 3,803.57$$
Step 3: Calculate the average rate of indirect tax
The average rate of indirect tax shows how much of the total income ($45,000) is spent on indirect taxes:
$$\text{Average Rate of Indirect Tax} = \frac{\text{Indirect Tax}}{\text{Total Income}} = \frac{3,803.57}{45,000} = 8.45\%$$
Step 4: Calculate the total average tax rate
- Add the direct tax (\$9,500) and the indirect tax (\$3,803.57) to find the total tax paid.
- Then divide by the total income ($45,000):
$$\text{Total Average Tax Rate} = \frac{9,500 + 3,803.57}{45,000} = 29.56\%$$
Evaluating taxes as a method to redistribute income
Advantages of taxes
- Taxes are effective for funding essential programs for lower-income groups:
- Tax revenues enable governments to fund crucial public services and welfare programs, such as:
- Healthcare: Ensuring access to affordable or free medical services improves the overall health and productivity of the population.
- Education: Public funding for schools and universities helps provide equal opportunities, allowing individuals from lower-income backgrounds to improve their skills and earning potential.
- Unemployment Benefits: Safety nets for those who are unemployed or underemployed prevent extreme financial hardship and support households during difficult times.
- Therefore, through funding public services and welfare programs, taxes play a vital role in supporting lower-income households and reducing poverty.
- Tax revenues enable governments to fund crucial public services and welfare programs, such as:
- Breaking cycles of poverty:
- By funding these programs, taxes can help address systemic inequalities and create opportunities for social mobility.
- Improved access to essential services can enable individuals to escape poverty, contribute to the economy, and improve their overall quality of life.
In a nutshell, if used accordingly, taxes have the main advantage of being redistributive.
Disadvantages of taxes
While taxes can reduce income disparities through redistribution, overly high tax rates on wealthier individuals or businesses can have negative consequences, such as:
- Economic Inefficiencies:
- High taxes, especially in progressive systems, disincentivize individuals and businesses from maximising their income by expanding operations.
- This can potentially limit economic growth and productivity.
- Reduced investments:
- Businesses and individuals may cut back on investments in innovation and infrastructure.
- This can harm long-term economic development.
- Tax avoidance:
- High taxes may encourage tax avoidance strategies, such as offshoring income or exploiting loopholes.
- This can undermine the effectiveness of the tax systems and lead to unfair outcomes.
Wealth tax to reduce inequality: Argentina's wealth tax
When: December 31, 2021
Where: Argentina
What: A progressive wealth tax with rates up to 1.75% on individuals with wealth exceeding ARS 3,000,000. The policy led to a 0.71% decrease in the Gini coefficient, indicating reduced inequality.
Why: To address wealth inequality by expanding the tax base and redistributing resources through government spending.
How:
- The government imposed a wealth tax requiring Argentinians to report all assets.
- Individuals with wealth below ARS 3,000,000 were exempt from taxation.
- The tax aimed to ensure that higher-income individuals contributed more to public finances.
So?
- Pros: increased government revenue, enabling spending on social programs and greater economic equality as wealthier individuals had less disposable income.
- Cons: potential discouragement of investment and immigration, as high net worth individuals may avoid residing in or investing in Argentina due to higher tax burdens.
Indirect taxes to reduce inequalities: US's luxury tax
When: November 1991
Where: United States
What: A 10% luxury tax was imposed on high-end goods such as watches, furs, boats, yachts, private jets, jewelry, and expensive cars, leading to a 0.78% decrease in the Gini coefficient.
Why: The tax aimed to generate additional revenue to reduce the federal budget deficit while redistributing wealth by targeting high-income individuals.
How:
- The luxury tax applied to expensive, non-essential goods, ensuring that wealthier individuals contributed more to public finances.
- Demand for these goods was relatively inelastic, meaning wealthy consumers continued purchasing them despite the tax.
So?:
- Pros: increased tax revenue helped reduce the deficit while redistributing income, as wealthier individuals bore the burden of the tax without significantly altering their purchasing habits.
- Cons: some luxury industries, such as yacht and private jet manufacturing, suffered job losses as demand declined in certain sectors. The policy was later revised to reduce negative effects on employment.
What is, in your opinion, the most equitable tax system (progressive, proportional, regressive)? Why?


