Organising concept is power; digital systems can widen or narrow the gap between rich and poor and decide who gets access, a fair wage, or a loan.
Supporting concepts: space (class maps onto geography) and systems (a small design choice ripples across whole communities).
Content topics: networks (who is connected), data and artificial intelligence (allocating work and money), and values and ethics throughout since livelihoods are at stake.
The Digital Divide
The digital divide is the gap between those with good access to digital technology and those without.
It falls along class and geographic lines: in 2025 roughly 94 percent of people in high-income countries are online against about 23 percent in low-income ones, with around 2.2 billion still offline; urban far outpaces rural.
A second-level divide concerns quality of access and skills: a fast home connection and laptop open doors a shared, capped phone does not.
Impacts vs implications: measurable gaps in access, speed, and skills, which shut people out of school, work, and services and compound over time as more of life moves online.
Work in the Gig Economy
The gig economy uses apps to connect workers to short tasks: driving, delivery, cleaning, or online micro-work.
The manager is an algorithm: algorithmic management assigns jobs, tracks, and scores workers by rating, offering flexibility but little security and pay that can fall below a wage floor.
Many platforms class workers as self-employed, removing rights labour has long held.
Contested: the EU Platform Work Directive (2024) introduces a presumption of employment and, for the first time, requires human review of algorithmic management decisions.
Algorithms and Inequality
Automated decision-making sorts people in ways that track class: who gets credit, welfare, insurance, or extra police attention.
Learning from a society's past, systems inherit its inequality: a credit model trained on records where poorer people were denied keeps denying them; predictive policing over-patrols already over-policed areas, a feedback loop.
Automation tends to replace routine, lower-wage jobs first, pushing the cost of change onto those least able to absorb it.
Values and ethics: a decision that looks neutral because a computer made it can still be deeply unfair (entrenched disadvantage, hidden discrimination).
Digital Systems That Lift People Up
Financial inclusion: mobile money lets people without a bank account save, send, and borrow using a basic phone.
In Kenya, M-Pesa helped raise access to formal financial services from around three-quarters of adults in 2016 to over four-fifths by 2021, and studies estimate it lifted many households out of extreme poverty.
Cheap smartphones open online learning, wider markets for small sellers, and remote work once out of reach.
Impacts vs implications: real gains in inclusion, income, and opportunity, against dependence on private platforms, new debt risks, and anyone without a device left further behind.
Weighing a Contested Balance
Two-sided: systems can widen access, open opportunity, and include people the old economy shut out. The same systems can deepen the divide, entrench inequality inside opaque models, and make work precarious.
The result depends on who is connected, whether algorithms can be seen and challenged, how workers are classified, and whom the tools serve; left unexamined they tend to harden existing inequalities.
Case study
System: Gig-economy platforms (ride-hailing, food delivery) use algorithmic management to run a large, low-paid workforce. Content topics: artificial intelligence and data (software that dispatches, tracks, and scores workers in real time).
Specifics: most platform workers are classed as self-employed, lacking minimum wage, sick pay, and protections while the app controls pay, tasks, and ratings. The EU adopted its Platform Work Directive in 2024: a legal presumption workers are employees unless proven otherwise, plus human oversight and explainability of important algorithmic decisions. Member states must implement by end of 2026.
Impacts and implications: Impacts: millions gained flexible income but many carry the insecurity of work with few rights. Implications: the directive could reclassify large numbers and force platforms to open algorithms, or firms may restructure to avoid it. A shift from letting the app rule to regulating it.
Concepts: power (control sat with the platform and its algorithm; the law rebalances it), values and ethics (fair pay, security, right to challenge a decision), change (the worker-employer relationship being rewritten). Social context, strong economic and political links.
Theory of Knowledge
TOK
A credit or welfare algorithm is called objective because it runs on data and maths, but the data records a society that was already unequal.
If a system faithfully reflects an unfair world, can its decisions be called neutral, and who is responsible for the unfairness it repeats?
Active recall
Self review
Explain the digital divide and distinguish the first-level from the second-level divide.
Explain what algorithmic management is and one way it reduces gig workers' security.
Give one way automated decisions can entrench class inequality.
Explain, with an example, how a digital system can widen financial inclusion.