International Conflict Resolution: How Do Organisations Try to Stop the World From Fighting?
- International conflict resolution is basically the diplomatic version of being the friend who jumps between two people shouting “Okay, breathe… let’s sort this out like adults.”
- Modern organisations, the League of Nations, United Nations, Allied conferences, try to keep global peace using tools like:
- Negotiation
- Peacekeeping
- Sanctions
- Occasionally the very persuasive power of collective side-eye
Peacemaking After World War I
The Treaty of Versailles (1919)
- The diplomatic equivalent of saying, “Germany, this is entirely your fault and you’re grounded forever.”
- Main Terms:
- War guilt clause (Germany accepts responsibility).
- Massive reparations.
- Military restrictions (tiny army, no air force).
- Loss of territory and colonies.
- Formation of the League of Nations.
- Intended Impact:
- Prevent Germany from ever threatening Europe again.
- Actual Impact:
- Germans felt humiliated and betrayed.
- Reparations tanked the economy.
- Extremist groups thrived by promising to undo the treaty.
- The League had no enforcement power, making it a peace organisation with the authority of a polite suggestion.
Peacemaking After World War II
- After the disaster of the interwar years, the Allies realised that punishing a country into oblivion wasn’t exactly a recipe for peace.
- So the focus after WWII shifted toward rebuilding, reconciliation, and stronger institutions.
The United Nations (1945)
- Built to succeed where the League stumbled dramatically.
- New Powers (that the League could only dream of):
- A Security Council that can actually enforce decisions.
- Power to authorise military intervention.
- Agencies for health, refugees, development, culture, human rights: actual global infrastructure.
- Universality: the aim was to get everyone involved, not just whoever felt like joining.
- The UN’s birth was the moment the world said, “Okay, seriously, let’s try this peace thing properly.”
The Marshall Plan (1948)
- Peace through money and lots of it.
- Impact:
- Rebuilt Western European economies.
- Reduced poverty and extremist appeal.
- Strengthened democratic governments.
- Helped create a stable, US-aligned Western Europe.
- Sometimes giving people jobs works much better than giving them ultimatums.
The Yalta & Potsdam Agreements (1945)
- The Allies reorganised the defeated Axis territories, especially Germany.
- Key Terms:
- Division of Germany into occupation zones.
- Demilitarisation and denazification.
- New borders for Eastern Europe.
- Prosecution of war criminals (Nuremberg Trials).
- Impact:
- Prevented immediate German rearmament.
- Set the stage for the Cold War divide.
- Created the conditions for long-term European reconstruction.
The Treaty of San Francisco (1951)
- The lesser-talked-about but massively important treaty that officially ended WWII between Japan and the Allied powers.
- Main Terms:
- Formally ended the state of war with Japan.
- Japan renounced claims to Korea, Taiwan, the Kuril Islands, and other territories.
- Established Japan’s sovereignty, allowing it to rebuild as a peaceful democracy.
- Laid the foundation for the US-Japan Security Alliance, a cornerstone of Cold War strategy in Asia.
- Required Japan to accept responsibility for wartime actions (though details were diplomatically softened).
- Impact:
- Enabled Japan’s incredibly rapid post-war recovery.
- Helped stabilise East Asia during early Cold War tensions.
- Reinforced the shift from punitive treaties to rehabilitative peacebuilding.
What Do These Peace Efforts Tell Us?
- Punishment alone doesn’t create peace (WWI taught this the hard way).
- Reconstruction and cooperation work far better (WWII’s postwar strategy).
- Treaties succeed when supported by strong institutions (UN > League).
- Economic stability is one of the best antidotes to extremism.
- Durable peace requires rebuilding identity and trust, not just redrawing borders.
- Timeline of Key Peacemaking Agreements
- Post–World War I
- 1919 - Treaty of Versailles: Punished Germany; created the League of Nations.
- 1919–1920 - League of Nations established: Early attempt at international conflict resolution (weak structure).
- Interwar Period
- 1930s - Failures of collective security: Japan in Manchuria, Italy in Ethiopia, Germany’s remilitarisation expose League weaknesses.
- Post - World War II
- 1945 - Yalta Conference: Allies plan postwar Europe, division of Germany, and conditions for surrender.
- 1945 - Potsdam Conference: Final occupation terms, demilitarisation, denazification, and border changes.
- 1945 - United Nations founded: Stronger peacekeeping organisation replaces the League.
- 1948 - Marshall Plan launched: Economic reconstruction of Western Europe begins.
- 1951 - Treaty of San Francisco: Officially ends war with Japan, restores sovereignty, and establishes new geopolitical order in the Pacific.
- Post–World War I
- Always compare WWI and WWII directly (punitive vs. reconstructive).
- Name at least one treaty per war (Versailles vs. Yalta/Potsdam/San Francisco).
- Highlight strengths of the UN compared to the League (Security Council, peacekeepers, enforcement).
- Explain how treaties affected national identity (e.g., humiliated Germany vs. rebuilt Japan).
- Use cause-and-effect language to show depth (“Because X happened, Y followed”).
- Repeat the anchor idea: long-term peace works when treaties rebuild, not punish.
- Include at least one evaluative judgement to show analytical strength (“effective to an extent…”).
- Why was the Treaty of Versailles considered a punitive peace, and how did this affect Germany’s political climate?
- What powers make the United Nations more effective than the League of Nations?
- How did the Marshall Plan contribute to long-term peace in Europe?
- What were the major terms and impacts of the Treaty of San Francisco on Japan and the Asia-Pacific region?
- Why did post-WWII peacebuilding focus on reconstruction rather than punishment, and how did this reshape global stability?