What Are Moral Dilemmas?
Moral Dilemma
A situation in which a person must choose between two or more actions, and every option involves a moral cost (for example, harming someone, betraying a value, or breaking a rule).
- A moral dilemma is not just a difficult choice. It is a choice where:
- There are conflicting values (for example, loyalty versus fairness), and
- No option feels completely "clean" because each carries consequences.
- In many dilemmas, the person choosing is pulled by different obligations at the same time, such as:
- Personal relationships (friendship, loyalty, promises)
- Social rules (laws, school policies, shared expectations)
- Care and protection (preventing harm, defending someone vulnerable)
- Integrity (honesty, responsibility, doing what you believe is right)
In the IB context, dilemmas connect strongly to being principled: acting with integrity, respecting the dignity and rights of others, and taking responsibility for your actions and their consequences.
- A common mistake is to treat dilemmas as simple "right vs wrong."
- Many dilemmas are closer to "right vs right," meaning two values both matter (for example, compassion and fairness), but you cannot fully satisfy both.
How Do Choices Lead To Judgements About Character And Identity?
Characterization
Characterization is the way a writer reveals a character’s personality, thoughts, and relationships.
- One reason moral dilemmas are powerful in narratives is that a character's response invites us to make judgements about who they are.
- When we watch someone choose, we often infer traits such as:
- Courage (acting despite fear)
- Integrity (sticking to principles)
- Compassion (prioritizing others' wellbeing)
- Self-interest (protecting oneself at others' expense)
- Loyalty (protecting friends or a group)
- This is why tasks around dilemmas often ask you to do two things:
- State what choice the person made, and
- Explain what that choice suggests about the "kind of person" they are.
- Be careful with certainty.
- A choice can suggest possibilities (for example, fear, confusion, or social pressure), not just a fixed moral label.
How Does Narrative Structure Increase The Pressure Of A Dilemma?
- Stories are designed around dilemmas to create reaction.
- Narrative structure can intensify uncertainty and shape sympathy.
- A chronological structure can make a dilemma feel like an inevitable build-up: we see the pressures accumulate until the character must act.
- Non-chronological structures (like flashbacks) can also reshape judgement by revealing new information later.
- When analyzing a dilemma in a text or film, avoid only retelling the plot.
- Aim for the:
- Dilemma
- Character's options
- Choice
- Technique used to shape our judgement (for example, tension, foreboding, point of view)
How Do Film And Literary Devices Guide How We Judge The Same Choice?
Two characters might make the same choice, but the audience may judge them differently depending on how the narrative presents them.
Devices that shape audience response
- Writers and directors can influence our interpretation of a dilemma through:
- Point of view (whose perspective we follow)
- Dialogue (honest confession vs evasive language)
- Juxtaposition (placing kindness next to cruelty)
- Symbolism (objects, colours, or settings representing values)
- Music and sound (tension, sorrow, triumph)
- Lighting and camera choices (warmth vs coldness, closeness vs distance)
Premeditated versus wnwittingly
- Sometimes narratives push us to judge intention.
- If harm is premeditated, audiences often judge it more severely than harm done unwittingly, even when outcomes are similar.
- This distinction is especially important in film analysis because directors may reveal intention slowly to control our sympathy.
Premeditated
Planned in advance rather than done impulsively.
Unwittingly
Done without realizing what the true effect or meaning is.
What Are Some Moral Dilemmas In Life Often Reflected In Literature?
Dilemmas outside school settings show how values collide in adult contexts too.
Hiring a friend versus being fair
- Grace must fill a role.
- Her friend Maria is qualified, but another candidate seems more qualified.
- Grace feels loyalty, but also guilt because she believes she should be impartial.
- A strong analysis here identifies the value clash (loyalty vs impartiality/fairness) and asks what a "just process" looks like.
This links strongly to the discourse around "nepo babies"
Keeping a promise versus correcting an injustice
- Paul promised David he would never reveal David committed graffiti.
- Later, an innocent person is accused.
- Paul pleads with David to confess, but David refuses.
- This dilemma tests:
- The moral weight of keeping promises
- Responsibility to prevent wrongful punishment
- Whether loyalty to a friend should survive when someone else is harmed
- Students sometimes assume "keeping a promise" is always moral.
- Promises can conflict with higher duties (for example, preventing serious harm).
- The dilemma is deciding which duty is stronger in context.
- What defines a moral dilemma beyond just being a "difficult choice"?
- What two things are you expected to explain when analyzing a character's choice in a dilemma?
- What is the difference between a premeditated action and an unwitting one?
- In the context of narrative structure, how does point of view influence an audience’s judgment of a character?