Overall Score: 16/20
Was this exemplar helpful?
Criteria A: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Coherence and logical development
Excellent
Organization and structure
Good
Conciseness and relevance
Criteria Feedback
- The exploration is highly coherent with a smooth narrative progression through data selection, modelling, numerical schemes and error analysis.
- Well-structured with a clear contents page, numbered sections, headings and a concise conclusion facilitating easy navigation.
- Several lengthy pharmacological background sections dilute conciseness and could be condensed.
- Minor formatting inconsistencies (e.g. dot leaders in the contents page, citation style) slightly detract from polish.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Good
Mathematical language and notation
Good
Multiple representations
Good
Logical structure and clarity
Criteria Feedback
- Mostly consistent and accurate use of mathematical language and notation (calculus symbols, subscripts, Taylor series) throughout the text.
- Effective use of multiple representations (tables, graphs, algebraic derivations, schematic diagrams) to support understanding.
- Logical explanations and step-by-step derivations are generally clear for an HL audience.
- A few graphs lack clear axis labels/units and resolution could be improved.
- Occasional overuse of math mode in headings and missing uncertainty measures in regression results reduce clarity.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Good
Independent thinking
Good
Personal approach
Good
Creativity and initiative
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Good
Depth of reflection
Good
Critical analysis
Good
Evaluation of outcomes
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Relevance of mathematics
Excellent
Level appropriateness
Excellent
Understanding and accuracy
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.