IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) SL Theory of Knowledge Example

Clear, specific real-world objects are identified throughout, and each one is firmly embedded in a genuine historical, cultural, or technological context.

The exhibition shows consistent engagement with the prompt and avoids becoming a purely descriptive tour of the objects.

The student's commentary demonstrates good conceptual control, especially when moving from the objects to broader implications about knowledge, interpretation, and responsibility.

The use of supporting sources gives the work credibility and shows that the exhibition is grounded in research rather than unsupported opinion.

Some claims are too deterministic or overstated, which weakens the precision of the analysis.

At points, the discussion becomes too broad, especially in the AI example, where the link to the specific object could be narrower and more exact.

The analysis would be stronger with more explicit use of evidence in the body of the commentary rather than relying on general assertions.

There is some room for greater nuance and balance, particularly when presenting contested interpretations of controversial objects.