IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) SL Theory of Knowledge Example

You identified three clearly specific real-world objects and kept them anchored in concrete contexts.

You made relevant TOK links by showing how evidence, corroboration, verification, and proof operate differently across the three objects.

Your writing shows genuine analytical range, moving beyond description to consider limitations, reliability, and the nature of knowledge in different areas.

The receipt and CCTV examples are especially effective because you explain why those objects matter as evidence rather than simply describing them.

Some claims would be stronger with more precise, object-specific support rather than broader assertions.

The mathematics section sometimes treats consensus or repeated testing as closer to proof than it really is, which weakens the argument.

A few historical and factual details need tighter verification and clearer distinction between what the object shows directly and what it only suggests.

The bibliography and in-text integration of sources are too limited for the range of claims made.