Visual Arts IA Example: Visual Arts Part 2: Process Portfolio | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Visual Arts HL Internal Assessment Example
Visual Arts Part 2: Process PortfolioHL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: A: Skills, techniques and processes
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Skills, techniques and processes
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student shows purposeful experimentation across a wide range of media and forms, and their material choices usually connect well to the ideas they are exploring.
The student documents technical processes with good specificity, including construction methods, surface treatment, joining, and image-making decisions.
The student responds to problems as they arise and makes adjustments that show real awareness of how materials behave.
Some processes are controlled and inventive, but a few outcomes still need more consistency and assurance to fully support the strongest possible result.
At times the student explains what happened technically, but they could more clearly show why one solution was stronger than another through comparative testing.
A few technical reflections would benefit from more explicit detail about the exact adjustments the student made and how those changes improved the work.
Criteria B: B: Critical investigation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Critical investigation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student investigates a broad range of artists and often translates those investigations directly into their own work.
The student usually explains not just who influenced them, but what specific strategy, material, or visual idea they adapted from that research.
The student's research has a clear impact on their developing intentions, especially when they turn artist references into personal formal decisions.
Some comparisons remain more descriptive than analytical, so the investigation could go further in exploring differences in context, meaning, and effect.
At times the link between source artist and the student's own work is strong, but the commentary could be more critical about why their adaptation changes the meaning.
A few sections would benefit from more sustained comparison rather than isolated references.
Criteria C: C: Communication of ideas and intentions
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Communication of ideas and intentions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: D: Reviewing, refining and reflecting
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Reviewing, refining and reflecting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: E: Presentation and subject-specific language
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Presentation and subject-specific language
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.