Report an issue
Visual Arts IA Example: Visual Arts Part 2: Process Portfolio | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Visual Arts HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Visual Arts Part 2: Process Portfolio
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Verified
Criteria A: A: Skills, techniques and processes
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Skills, techniques and processes
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student shows confident experimentation across a wide range of media and processes.
The student's material choices are clearly linked to their intentions, especially around contrast, realism, and dramatic effect.
The student responds to technical problems by adapting their process rather than repeating the same approach.
The student demonstrates control in surface preparation, layering, and testing different media against each other.
Some technique descriptions stay general and would benefit from more exact process language.
A few outcomes still show uneven tonal control or less resolved detail.
At times, the student identifies a problem but does not fully explain the specific technique adjustment that follows.
The strongest experimentation is evident, but the commentary is not always as precise as the making.
Criteria B: B: Critical investigation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Critical investigation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student investigates a broad and relevant range of artists and practices.
The student makes clear links between their research and their own developing work.
The student goes beyond description in several places by showing how an artist’s methods affect their intentions.
The student's study of formal elements, cultural meaning, and materials gives their work a thoughtful foundation.
Some responses to artists still lean toward summary rather than deeper analysis.
A few claims would be stronger with more precise or authoritative source handling.
The student could develop a more consistent critical voice when comparing influences.
The connection between research and personal practice is strong, but not yet fully sustained at the most insightful level throughout every page.
Criteria C: C: Communication of ideas and intentions
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Communication of ideas and intentions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: D: Reviewing, refining and reflecting
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Reviewing, refining and reflecting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: E: Presentation and subject-specific language
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Presentation and subject-specific language
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.