Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

What is the effect of different starting stances of crossover stance, frontfoot forward, and backfoot on the base on the sprint time (s) from base to base in slow-pitch softball in high school female students aged 17-18 year olds who know how to play softball?HL

Overall Score: 22/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Choice of topic clearly rooted in personal experience
Sustained evidence of independent design decisions (randomisation, pilot testing)
Justification directly linked to student’s own sporting context

Criteria B: Exploration

6/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Good

B.2Background information quality

Good

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Moderate

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Focused and relevant research question identifying specific variables
Thorough background citing multiple biomechanical sources
Highly appropriate methodology with randomisation, controlled variables, pilot testing
Comprehensive safety and ethical measures with detailed risk table

Some background material is tangential (e.g., volleyball studies)
Minor detail missing on random number generator implementation

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Moderate

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Good

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Moderate

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Moderate

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Good

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

4/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Good

E.2Structure and organization

Good

E.3Focus and relevance

Good

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

What is the effect of different starting stances of crossover stance, frontfoot forward, and backfoot on the base on the sprint time (s) from base to base in slow-pitch softball in high school female students aged 17-18 year olds who know how to play softball?HL

Overall Score: 22/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Choice of topic clearly rooted in personal experience
Sustained evidence of independent design decisions (randomisation, pilot testing)
Justification directly linked to student’s own sporting context

Criteria B: Exploration

6/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Good

B.2Background information quality

Good

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Moderate

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Focused and relevant research question identifying specific variables
Thorough background citing multiple biomechanical sources
Highly appropriate methodology with randomisation, controlled variables, pilot testing
Comprehensive safety and ethical measures with detailed risk table

Some background material is tangential (e.g., volleyball studies)
Minor detail missing on random number generator implementation

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Moderate

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Good

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Moderate

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Moderate

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Good

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

4/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Good

E.2Structure and organization

Good

E.3Focus and relevance

Good

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.