This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) IA Exemplar: Body Weight… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent does body weight (measured in kilograms) affect the upper body muscular endurance (measured through maximal body weight push ups) of males aged 14 to 15HL
Overall Score: 12/24
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Personal Engagement
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria Strands
A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking
Excellent
A.2Justification and personal significance
Excellent
A.3Personal input and initiative
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
You chose a question that is clearly connected to your own experience and interests, which gives the investigation a strong sense of purpose.
You showed independent thinking by narrowing the inquiry to a testable relationship and explaining why it matters to your sport.
You took real ownership of the investigation through the planning, setup, supervision, and organization of the data collection.
You could make the personal significance even more explicit by explaining exactly how the findings would change your training decisions.
Some parts of the reflection could go further in showing how your own viewpoint shaped the design choices.
A few moments of personal input are strong, but the link back to future action could be developed more fully.
Criteria B: Exploration
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Research question focus and relevance
Excellent
B.2Background information quality
Good
B.3Methodology appropriateness
Good
B.4Safety and ethical considerations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Your research question is focused and measurable, with clear variables, a defined participant group, and an appropriate performance test.
Your background information is relevant and supports the investigation by defining the key concepts and connecting them to endurance performance.
Your method includes sensible safeguards such as a warm-up, supervision, and an organized testing procedure.
You show strong awareness of ethics and safety through informed participation, anonymization, and attention to injury prevention.
The method would be stronger if the weighing and push-up scoring conditions were standardized more tightly.
Several confounding factors are identified well, but they are not fully controlled in practice.
The background would benefit from deeper integration of the physiology and from clearer links between the literature and your exact investigation.
Some procedural details, such as clothing rules, rest conditions, and exact judging criteria, could be stated more precisely.
Criteria C: Analysis
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
C.1Raw data quality and quantity
Excellent
C.2Data processing and accuracy
Good
C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty
Poor
C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Evaluation
1/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
D.1Conclusion relevance and support
Good
D.2Comparison to scientific context
Good
D.3Discussion of limitations and errors
Good
D.4Suggestions for improvement
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria E: Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
E.1Clarity of presentation
Excellent
E.2Structure and organization
Excellent
E.3Focus and relevance
Excellent
E.4Use of terminology and conventions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
