Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec) measured by timing gates in female football athletes ages 15-18?HL

Overall Score: 20/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Clear personal engagement linked to three years of competitive football and a real match observation
Significant independent thinking in designing and leading the investigation (participant organisation, timing-gate setup, data collection)
Explicit justification of personal significance and curiosity, supported by relevant literature

Criteria B: Exploration

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Excellent

B.2Background information quality

Excellent

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Good

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Good

Criteria Feedback

Precise, fully focused research question with clearly defined variables and participant details
Comprehensive and entirely appropriate background information supported by multiple peer-reviewed sources
Well-structured methodology with detailed control of key variables and clear safety/ethical considerations

Lack of order randomization and limited mitigation of confounding factors such as diet and fatigue
Minor clarification needed on PNF stretching usage and standardisation of environmental conditions

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Excellent

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Excellent

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Good

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Good

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Excellent

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

3/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Excellent

E.2Structure and organization

Excellent

E.3Focus and relevance

Moderate

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec) measured by timing gates in female football athletes ages 15-18?HL

Overall Score: 20/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Clear personal engagement linked to three years of competitive football and a real match observation
Significant independent thinking in designing and leading the investigation (participant organisation, timing-gate setup, data collection)
Explicit justification of personal significance and curiosity, supported by relevant literature

Criteria B: Exploration

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Excellent

B.2Background information quality

Excellent

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Good

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Good

Criteria Feedback

Precise, fully focused research question with clearly defined variables and participant details
Comprehensive and entirely appropriate background information supported by multiple peer-reviewed sources
Well-structured methodology with detailed control of key variables and clear safety/ethical considerations

Lack of order randomization and limited mitigation of confounding factors such as diet and fatigue
Minor clarification needed on PNF stretching usage and standardisation of environmental conditions

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Excellent

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Excellent

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Good

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Good

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Excellent

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

3/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Excellent

E.2Structure and organization

Excellent

E.3Focus and relevance

Moderate

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec*) measured by timing gates in female football athletes* ages 15-18?HL

Want a report just like this?

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) HL Internal Assessment Example

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec*) measured by timing gates in female football athletes* ages 15-18?HL

Want a report just like this?

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

Criteria Strands

Criteria Feedback

Unlock all criteria

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec) measured by timing gates in female football athletes ages 15-18?HL

To what extent do different types of stretching (dynamic, static, PNF) as a warm-up conducted 1 min before the sprint influence the 30m sprint time test ( ± 0.001sec) measured by timing gates in female football athletes ages 15-18?HL