Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) SL Internal Assessment Example

How do (variations) in muscle fibre composition of the quadriceps influence the completion time of the Bronco Fitness Test in semi-professional male rugby players aged 16-18?SL

Overall Score: 21/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Clear, personal link between rugby experience and research question
Distinct evidence of independent thinking in experimental design and reflection
Consistent personal initiative in developing consent processes and control measures

Criteria B: Exploration

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Good

B.2Background information quality

Good

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Moderate

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Good

Criteria Feedback

Highly relevant and focused research question with clear rationale
Comprehensive background drawing on primary studies
Robust safety and ethical protocols (consent, PAR-Q, anonymisation)

Proxy measurement (vertical-jump test) remains somewhat ambiguous
Methodology has minor limitations (single Bronco trial, lack of instrument calibration discussion)

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Excellent

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Excellent

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Good

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Moderate

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Excellent

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

4/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Good

E.2Structure and organization

Good

E.3Focus and relevance

Good

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Loading document preview...

IB Sports, exercise and health science (SEHS) SL Internal Assessment Example

How do (variations) in muscle fibre composition of the quadriceps influence the completion time of the Bronco Fitness Test in semi-professional male rugby players aged 16-18?SL

Overall Score: 21/24

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Personal Engagement

2/2

Criteria Strands

A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking

Excellent

A.2Justification and personal significance

Excellent

A.3Personal input and initiative

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Clear, personal link between rugby experience and research question
Distinct evidence of independent thinking in experimental design and reflection
Consistent personal initiative in developing consent processes and control measures

Criteria B: Exploration

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Research question focus and relevance

Good

B.2Background information quality

Good

B.3Methodology appropriateness

Moderate

B.4Safety and ethical considerations

Good

Criteria Feedback

Highly relevant and focused research question with clear rationale
Comprehensive background drawing on primary studies
Robust safety and ethical protocols (consent, PAR-Q, anonymisation)

Proxy measurement (vertical-jump test) remains somewhat ambiguous
Methodology has minor limitations (single Bronco trial, lack of instrument calibration discussion)

Criteria C: Analysis

5/6

Criteria Strands

C.1Raw data quality and quantity

Excellent

C.2Data processing and accuracy

Excellent

C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty

Moderate

C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Evaluation

5/6

Criteria Strands

D.1Conclusion relevance and support

Good

D.2Comparison to scientific context

Moderate

D.3Discussion of limitations and errors

Excellent

D.4Suggestions for improvement

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria E: Communication

4/4

Criteria Strands

E.1Clarity of presentation

Good

E.2Structure and organization

Good

E.3Focus and relevance

Good

E.4Use of terminology and conventions

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.