How do different types of physical fatigue (aerobic vs. anaerobic) impact the reaction time of high school boys (age 14-18)?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Personal Engagement
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Evidence of personal engagement and independent thinking
Excellent
A.2Justification and personal significance
Excellent
A.3Personal input and initiative
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Clear and sustained personal engagement through linking investigation to own basketball experience
- Original design of questionnaires, consent forms and bespoke equipment protocol demonstrating initiative
- Detailed rationale showing genuine curiosity and personal significance
Criteria B: Exploration
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Research question focus and relevance
Excellent
B.2Background information quality
Excellent
B.3Methodology appropriateness
Moderate
B.4Safety and ethical considerations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Research question is highly focused, relevant and directly testable
- Background information is entirely appropriate, well‐cited and scientifically coherent
- Methodology is comprehensive and detailed, with clear HIIT and beep‐test protocols
- Full awareness of safety and ethical issues demonstrated via robust risk assessments and consent procedures
- Lacks randomization of session order to control learning or fatigue‐order effects
- Hydration monitoring is assumed rather than explicitly measured
- Hardware consistency (laptop and input‐device latency) could be better controlled
Criteria C: Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Raw data quality and quantity
Excellent
C.2Data processing and accuracy
Good
C.3Consideration of measurement uncertainty
Moderate
C.4Data interpretation and conclusion validity
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Conclusion relevance and support
Good
D.2Comparison to scientific context
Moderate
D.3Discussion of limitations and errors
Excellent
D.4Suggestions for improvement
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Clarity of presentation
Good
E.2Structure and organization
Good
E.3Focus and relevance
Good
E.4Use of terminology and conventions
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.