Psychology IA Exemplar: To what extent does a 30-second interference… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent does a 30-second interference task affect the recall of the final four words in a word list among high-school students?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Introduction
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Investigation aim and relevance
Excellent
A.2Theory/model description and connection
Excellent
A.3Hypothesis and variables
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student clearly states a relevant aim and explains why it matters in relation to the theory and the real-world context.
The student's hypothesis is directional and their independent and dependent variables are both identified and operationalized clearly.
The student shows strong understanding of the memory model and connects it directly to the investigation.
The hypothesis could be written more smoothly and formally as a complete research claim.
The wording of the dependent variable could be made even more precise and polished.
A slightly tighter explanation of why the specific final list positions were chosen would strengthen the link between theory and method.
Criteria B: Exploration
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Research design
Excellent
B.2Sampling and participants
Excellent
B.3Variables and materials
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student explains the independent-measures design rather than simply naming it, and they give a sensible reason for using it.
The student identifies the sampling method clearly and explains why it was practical for the investigation.
The student describes the controlled variables and materials in a way that shows they understand their role in keeping the test fair.
Some parts of the design explanation could be more precise, especially where control is attributed to the design rather than to standardization.
The sample is convenient and limited to one class, so generalizability is restricted.
A few procedural details would benefit from clearer justification, such as how allocation was managed and how communication between groups was prevented.
Criteria C: Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Statistical analysis
Excellent
C.2Graphical presentation
Excellent
C.3Findings interpretation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Findings discussion
Excellent
D.2Strengths and limitations
Excellent
D.3Modifications
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.