Psychology IA Exemplar: The experiment about the influence of the… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Internal Assessment Example
The experiment about the influence of the anchor value (high vs. low) on numerical estimates in high school studentsSL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Introduction
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Investigation aim and relevance
Excellent
A.2Theory/model description and connection
Excellent
A.3Hypothesis and variables
Good
Criteria Feedback
The aim is clear, specific, and well-justified in relation to the psychological context of anchoring.
The student explains the Dual Process Model accurately and connects it directly to the mechanism being investigated.
The hypothesis identifies the independent and dependent variables correctly, and the research focus is easy to follow.
The hypothesis would be stronger if the anchor values and measurement unit were explicitly operationalized.
The link between the theoretical model and the investigation could be made even more explicit in terms of why price estimation is vulnerable to anchoring.
Criteria B: Exploration
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Research design
Excellent
B.2Sampling and participants
Excellent
B.3Variables and materials
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The research design is explained rather than merely named, and the student justifies why an independent-groups structure suits the question.
The participant sample is described clearly with relevant demographic details and a sensible rationale for the choice of age group.
The student explains the controlled variables and materials in a way that shows awareness of how consistency supports the investigation.
Alternating participants is not truly random assignment, so the allocation method is methodologically weaker than described.
The justification for the car image is weakened because the vehicle is visibly identifiable as a Mercedes-Benz, which may introduce brand familiarity effects.
Some sampling choices are described well, but the trade-off between practicality and representativeness could be explained more fully.
Criteria C: Analysis
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Statistical analysis
Moderate
C.2Graphical presentation
Moderate
C.3Findings interpretation
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Findings discussion
Excellent
D.2Strengths and limitations
Excellent
D.3Modifications
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.