Psychology (First Exam 2027) IA Exemplar: One More Hour Awake | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology (First Exam 2027) SL Internal Assessment Example
One more hour awakeSL
Loading scores...
5
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 5
Criteria A: Criterion A: Introduction
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Aim or research question
Excellent
A.2Real-life problem
Good
A.3Findings and conclusions of research
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's research question is clear, focused, and fully operationalised with a defined population, independent variable, and dependent variable.
The student explains the real-life issue well and connects it to why their investigation matters for Year 12 students.
The student uses two relevant studies effectively to support the rationale for their investigation and shows awareness that their design tests association rather than causation.
The link between the research literature and the student's exact operational choices could be made even more explicit.
The practical consequences for the population are implied more than fully developed.
There is some inconsistency in how the outcome measure is described, which slightly weakens the precision of the introduction.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Research methodology
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Research method choice
Excellent
B.2Procedure
Excellent
B.3Ethical considerations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student clearly explains why a natural groups approach is appropriate for their question and why bedtime is not being manipulated.
The student's procedure is coherent, sequential, and detailed enough to be followed, including timing, scoring, and key controls.
The student identifies ethical issues that matter for this investigation and links them directly to their method, including consent, confidentiality, and avoiding unnecessary risk.
Some procedural details could be even more precise, especially around standardisation of instructions and the distractor task.
The rationale for the exact bedtime cut-off could be justified more fully.
A few practical method details, such as data handling logistics, are not fully specified.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Data collection
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Data collection tool
Good
C.2Decisions made when creating the tool
Excellent
C.3Potential challenges
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Discussion
1/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Potential findings and implications
Good
D.2Researcher bias
Moderate
D.3Additional research method
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.