IB Psychology SL Internal Assessment Example

The student states a clear, focused aim and explains why the investigation matters in relation to learning and memory.

The student's theory section shows a solid understanding of levels of processing and links it to the manipulation in the study.

The student's hypothesis is operationalized clearly, with both variables defined in a way that can be tested.

Some of the theory wording is a little imprecise, especially where it sounds like depth of processing automatically determines transfer into long-term memory.

The practical relevance could be phrased more cautiously to avoid sounding too absolute.

The hypothesis could be tighter and more concise so the IV, DV, and prediction stand out even more clearly.

The student clearly identifies the experimental design and explains why it was suitable for comparing two conditions.

The student's sampling method is named correctly and the participant group is described clearly.

The student includes a range of controlled features and materials, showing awareness of what needed to stay consistent across conditions.

Some justifications are too brief or rely on weak claims, especially when explaining why the design improves the study.

The explanation of participant choice could be more precise and avoid broad or unsupported wording.

Several control measures are described well but not fully justified in terms of how they affect validity or reliability.