Psychology IA Exemplar: A partial replication of Anderson and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Internal Assessment Example
A partial replication of Anderson and Pichert’s Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective study (1978)SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Introduction
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Investigation aim and relevance
Excellent
A.2Theory/model description and connection
Excellent
A.3Hypothesis and variables
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student states a focused, relevant aim and explains why the investigation matters beyond the task itself.
The student describes Schema Theory accurately and connects it clearly to the manipulation and expected recall outcome.
The student operationalizes the independent and dependent variables clearly enough for the study to be measurable and testable.
The research hypothesis could mirror the operational language of the dependent variable even more closely.
A slightly tighter wording of the hypothesis would make the prediction easier to compare directly with the analysis later in the report.
Criteria B: Exploration
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Research design
Excellent
B.2Sampling and participants
Excellent
B.3Variables and materials
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student explains the choice of research design rather than just naming it, and they link it to reduced carryover and fatigue effects.
The student describes the sampling approach and participant characteristics clearly, and they justify the sample in practical terms.
The student identifies and explains several important controls and material choices, showing awareness of how they protect the validity of the investigation.
The explanation of allocation would be stronger if the student made clearer whether randomization happened by class only or at the individual level.
Some material choices, such as the simplification of the passage and the filler task, could be justified in a little more depth.
One or two claims about the sample are a little overstated and should be phrased more cautiously.
Criteria C: Analysis
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Statistical analysis
Moderate
C.2Graphical presentation
Excellent
C.3Findings interpretation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Findings discussion
Good
D.2Strengths and limitations
Good
D.3Modifications
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.