Report an issue
Physics IA Exemplar: Vérification de la troisième loi de Kepler et… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Physics HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Vérification de la troisième loi de Kepler et estimation de la masse du Soleil
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Research question context
Excellent
A.2
Methodological considerations for collecting data
Good
A.3
Methodological considerations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student placed the investigation in a clear and scientifically appropriate astronomical context.
The student explained why the semi-major axis and the eight-planet dataset are relevant to their aim.
The student's methodology is mostly reproducible because they identify the source, show the processing steps, and include code.
The comparative wording of the research question is not fully operationalized.
Some data-selection and retrieval details are still too vague for complete replication.
The student's justification for uncertainty choices needs to be more carefully supported.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Communication of data recording and processing
Excellent
B.2
Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3
Data processing quality
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's raw-to-processed data trail is clear and easy to follow.
The student includes a worked example that shows how the processing and uncertainty propagation are done.
The student's calculations and regression-based processing are mostly appropriate and communicated well.
The uncertainty treatment is not fully consistent across the written explanation, tables, and code.
Some uncertainty values are based on display precision rather than clearly validated source uncertainty.
The processing would be stronger if the planet-by-planet uncertainties were used consistently in the regression and graph.
Criteria C: Conclusion
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2
Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2
Suggested improvements
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.