Physics IA Exemplar: To what extent do various concentrations of… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent do various concentrations of ethanol (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%) affect the specific heat capacity (measured in J kg-1K-1) of a water-ethanol solution , as measured by a calorimetric setup?SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Good
A.2Methodological considerations for collecting data
Moderate
A.3Methodological considerations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student chose a focused investigation topic with a clear scientific purpose.
The student showed some thoughtful control of variables and justified the concentration range with practical reasoning.
The student's apparatus list, procedure, and repeat measurements provide a workable basis for reproducing much of the investigation.
The research question is still not fully precise because the concentration is not clearly defined.
Several important procedural details are missing, such as exact repeat numbers in the method and more specific setup instructions.
Some parts of the design are internally inconsistent, especially around the stated hypothesis and the solution volume description.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Poor
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Poor
B.3Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student presented raw data alongside processed values, which makes their working easier to follow.
The student attempted to include uncertainty and error bars, showing awareness that measurements are not exact.
The student used the correct general relationship for calculating specific heat capacity and identified an overall decreasing trend in the results.
There are several numerical and unit inconsistencies in the processing, including mismatched uncertainty values and changing specific-heat-capacity results across tables.
Some calculations are not shown clearly enough to make the workflow fully transparent or precise.
The graphing and trend interpretation are not fully consistent with the tables and do not always use matching units or modelling language.
Criteria C: Conclusion
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
D.2Suggested improvements
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.