Report an issue
Physics IA Exemplar: The Relationship Between Amount of Sugar in… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Physics HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
The Relationship Between Amount of Sugar in Water and Amount of Splash
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Research Design
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Research question context
Good
A.2
Methodological considerations for collecting data
Moderate
A.3
Methodological considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student developed a focused, measurable research question with clear variables and a practical experimental context.
The student included thoughtful control-variable considerations and enough procedural detail to show how the investigation was intended to work.
The scientific framing is not yet specific enough to isolate the main causal mechanism behind the splash effect.
Some steps and solution-preparation details remain ambiguous, which makes full replication difficult.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2
Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3
Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student's raw results are organized clearly, making it easy to trace the pattern in the measurements.
The student presented a graph and processed values that make the overall trend in the data visible.
The student showed some awareness of uncertainty through repeats, error bars, and gradient uncertainty.
The uncertainty treatment is not consistent across the dataset and is not handled with enough precision.
Some processed values and table labels are unclear or repetitive, which weakens the traceability of the analysis.
A few numerical choices reduce accuracy, such as rounding away information and applying one spread to all concentrations.
Criteria C: Conclusion
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2
Scientific context comparison
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2
Suggested improvements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.