Physics IA Exemplar: Research question: How does the height of the… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Internal Assessment Example
Research question: How does the height of the water column (20cm , 40cm, 60cm, 80cm,
100cm ) affect the flow rate of water through a horizontal capillary tube at a fixed radius?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations for collecting data
Good
A.3Methodological considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's research question is tightly focused and clearly identifies the variables they are investigating.
The student places the question in a specific physical context using pressure head and fluid flow.
The student's method includes several sensible controls and a reproducible constant-head design.
The method does not fully explain how the tube dimensions were measured.
The discussion of flow conditions does not sufficiently establish that the model assumptions are valid.
Some procedural details are still ambiguous enough that another student would not reproduce the investigation exactly.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Poor
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student includes repeated trials and an uncertainty table, which shows good awareness of measurement limitations.
The student's processed tables present units and uncertainty information, which helps the reader follow the data.
The student attempts to connect the graph and processed values back to the research question.
The raw data presentation is not fully clear because the measured quantity is not always explicitly labelled.
The graph labeling and later interpretation are inconsistent in places.
Some processed values and final numerical results do not match each other, which weakens reliability.
Criteria C: Conclusion
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2Suggested improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.