Physics IA Exemplar: Investigation on how different spins (topspin,… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Internal Assessment Example
Investigation on how different spins (topspin, backspin and no spin) and launch speed (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40m/s) produced by a tennis ball machine affect the trajectory and bounce of the tennis ball?SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Research Design
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations for collecting data
Good
A.3Methodological considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student places the investigation in a clear and meaningful physical context and shows a good understanding of the variables they are trying to test.
The student's procedure includes several practical controls and enough detail that another student could broadly repeat the experiment.
The student's research question is still a little broad because it combines more than one outcome without clearly separating them.
Some important setup details are missing, especially how the machine settings translate into actual launch speed and spin rate.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Good
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student presents their raw results in an organised way and makes it easy to follow how the measurements were turned into processed values.
The student shows awareness of measurement uncertainty and uses repeated trials to reveal variation in the data.
The student's uncertainty treatment is incomplete because the spread in repeated trials is not quantified or carried through the calculations.
Some of the processing is physically and conceptually insecure, especially where unverified launch conditions are treated as if they were controlled.
The way the student reports precision is not always consistent, which makes the data handling harder to trust fully.
Criteria C: Conclusion
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Good
C.2Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
D.2Suggested improvements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.