Physics IA Exemplar: Investigating the relationship between sound… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Internal Assessment Example
Investigating the relationship between sound frequency and maxima spacing in a double-speaker interference experimentSL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations for collecting data
Good
A.3Methodological considerations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's research question is focused, specific, and clearly tied to the physics they are investigating.
The student establishes a relevant theoretical basis for the investigation and connects frequency, wavelength, spacing, and the speed of sound.
The student's method includes enough detail to show careful planning, including controlled variables, repeated trials, and a defined measurement procedure.
The student's diagrams and apparatus descriptions help the investigation feel purposeful and well organized.
Some practical details are still not fully precise, especially how peaks were identified and how the sound source coherence was confirmed.
The rationale for the chosen measurement range and geometry could be explained more fully to show why they were sufficient for the investigation.
A predicted graph shape or stronger justification of the expected relationship would make the design even more scientific.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates the data processing in a generally clear way, including example calculations and a logical transformation from decibels to linear intensity.
The student makes an appropriate attempt to address uncertainty through repeated measurements, uncertainty bars, and propagated uncertainty in the final result.
The student's processed tables and graphs make the analytical pathway understandable and show a serious attempt to handle the raw data systematically.
The student includes enough working to allow the reader to see how the final trend was obtained.
The precision of some processing steps is reduced by inconsistencies in uncertainty values and incomplete reporting of standard deviations.
The method used to identify peaks and extract final spacing values is not fully reproducible and relies too much on visual estimation.
There is a significant issue in how the interference features are interpreted, since some minima are treated as maxima.
The fitting procedure and gradient uncertainty need to be explained more clearly so the final trend can be trusted more confidently.
Criteria C: Conclusion
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Good
C.2Scientific context comparison
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2Suggested improvements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.