Overall Score: 21/24
Was this exemplar helpful?
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Research question context
Excellent
Methodological considerations for collecting data
Excellent
Methodological considerations
Criteria Feedback
- Research question embedded in a highly specific and appropriate context
- Procedure fully reproducible with annotated photographs, variable tables and clear rationale
- Comprehensive consideration of controls and multiple-trial approach reducing random error
- Minor omissions in coil dimensions and data-logger settings prevent absolutely flawless reproducibility
- Quantitative justification for neglecting air resistance is missing
Criteria B: Data Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Communication of data recording and processing
Good
Consideration of uncertainties
Good
Data processing quality
Criteria Feedback
- Data tables and graphs include correct headings, units and uncertainty notation with clear figure captions
- Appropriate uncertainty calculations (instrumental and spread-based) and uncertainty bounds on the best-fit line
- Linear regression well executed, demonstrating the expected v ∝ √h relationship
- Typographical slips and inconsistent significant figures reduce precision slightly
- Height measurement uncertainty was omitted and one percentage uncertainty was mis-copied
- Some uncertainty propagation methods (range/2, averaging) are unconventional
Criteria C: Conclusion
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Conclusion relevance and support
Good
Scientific context comparison
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Moderate
Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
Suggested improvements
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.