Overall Score: 19/24
Was this exemplar helpful?
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Research question context
Excellent
Methodological considerations for collecting data
Excellent
Methodological considerations
Criteria Feedback
- Research question is embedded in a specific, real‐world electrochemical context with clear motivation
- Methodology is described in sufficient detail to allow reproducibility
- Key methodological considerations (trials, concentration range, uncertainty propagation, outlier treatment, control variables) are fully explained
- Minor ambiguities remain in probe measurement range and precise temperature control method
- Occasional verbosity in background and hypothesis statements detracts from succinctness
Criteria B: Data Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Good
Communication of data recording and processing
Excellent
Consideration of uncertainties
Excellent
Data processing quality
Criteria Feedback
- Data recording and processing are communicated clearly with labeled tables, units and uncertainties
- Uncertainty propagation is handled correctly, with error bars and R² values presented
- Raw data averaging, CV validation and regression analysis demonstrate strong analytical understanding
- Formatting issues (garbled symbols, inconsistent significant figures, missing unit labels) impede precision
- One data point lacks an uncertainty estimate and unit conventions vary across tables
Criteria C: Conclusion
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Conclusion relevance and support
Good
Scientific context comparison
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Moderate
Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
Suggested improvements
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.