Physics IA Exemplar: How can the spring constant of a Nerf gun be… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Internal Assessment Example
How can the spring constant of a Nerf gun be determined by analyzing the vertical motion (ascent time and height) of a dart using principles of energy conservation and Hooke’s Law?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations for collecting data
Moderate
A.3Methodological considerations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student framed the investigation in a specific and relevant physics context, which makes the aim clear and manageable.
The student identified several important methodological factors such as launch angle, frame rate, air conditions, and repeat trials.
The student's equipment list and overall sequence show that they had a workable plan for collecting data.
The independent variable is not operationally central in the method, because compression is named but not actually varied.
Some procedural details are missing, so another person could not fully reproduce the investigation without ambiguity.
Several methodological choices are stated but not fully justified in terms of how they affect data sufficiency and validity.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Poor
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's tables and worked calculations make the processed data easy to follow.
The student consistently uses units and uncertainty notation, which improves clarity.
The student applies the relevant kinematic and energy relationships in a mostly appropriate way for the model they are using.
Repeating the calculation across trials and averaging the result is a sensible way to improve reliability.
The raw evidence for all trials is not shown as clearly as it could be, so the reader cannot verify every processed value easily.
Some uncertainty values are not well justified, and they are not propagated through to the final result.
The graph does not add much new evidence because the plotted quantities are derived from the same equation used in the calculations.
There are some conceptual issues in the interpretation of the energy values, especially at the peak of the motion.
Criteria C: Conclusion
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2Suggested improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.