IB Philosophy SL Internal Assessment Example

You identify the philosophical issue clearly and explicitly, and your question stays focused on whether AI-generated images can count as art and have aesthetic value.

You connect the stimulus to the broader inquiry well by using Edmond de Belamy as a concrete case that raises genuine philosophical questions.

You broaden the stimulus into a wider debate rather than treating it as a one-off example.

Your opening could do a little more to separate the art-status question from the aesthetic-value question at the outset.

Some of the later discussion occasionally blurs the exact issue being tested, especially when moving between authorship, creativity, and value.

Your essay has a discernible overall structure and is generally easy to follow.

You signal the main movement of the response by separating discussion of art-status and aesthetic value.

Your layout is readable and the line of argument remains coherent for most of the response.

Some transitions are abrupt, so the movement from one theory to the next is not always smooth.

At times, the essay introduces several ideas quickly, which can make the conceptual progression less precise than it could be.

A few grammatical and phrasing issues slightly reduce clarity in places.