IB Music SL Internal Assessment Example

You selected evidence that is clearly relevant to the project aim and shows the connection between the artworks, consultation, and your musical response.

You included documentation that helps the reader see the creative intention behind each piece.

Your evidence supports the collaborative nature of the work and shows that the project was built around real feedback and response.

The evidence is not presented in a consistently curated way, so some of it is difficult to use as strong proof of development.

Key musical materials such as scores, annotated excerpts, DAW screenshots, or accessible audio evidence are missing.

Some supporting images are cropped, duplicated, or blank, which weakens the overall clarity and usefulness of the evidence.

You explain several important creative challenges and how you responded to them, such as balancing the saxophone in a soft texture and working with an unfamiliar instrument.

You justify musical choices in relation to expressive goals, including modality, tempo, texture, articulation, and register.

You show meaningful collaboration by incorporating feedback and revising in response to comments from others.

You identify realistic areas for further development, including starting earlier, refining more carefully, and researching unfamiliar instruments more thoroughly.

Your reflection does not consistently evaluate the success of alternative choices or compare different possibilities in depth.

Some improvement strategies remain broad rather than being tested against specific musical outcomes.

Audience response is mentioned, but it is not examined in enough detail to show a sustained evaluation of impact.