Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
What mathematical model best represents the global spread of IB schools over 50 years (1993 to 2023)?HL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student presents their investigation in a clear, reader-friendly sequence with a visible introduction, development, evaluation, and conclusion.
The student's tables, graphs, and section headings make it easy to follow the modelling process.
Most of the material stays focused on the task and supports the comparison of models.
The research question is not fully aligned with the variable the student actually models, which reduces overall coherence.
Several sections repeat the same ideas or include extended working that adds length without improving the argument.
The conclusion could be tighter and more precise, especially where the student summarises the best model and its limitation.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2Multiple representations
Good
B.3Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a range of appropriate mathematical terms such as residuals, RMSE, r-squared, logarithmic transformation, and logistic carrying capacity.
The student includes multiple representations, including data tables, scatter plots, transformed plots, fitted curves, and residual tables.
The student's mathematical discussion is usually readable and connected to the graphs and equations they present.
The student's notation is not always consistent, especially for residuals and predicted values.
Some numerical statements are inaccurate or conflicting, which makes parts of the communication harder to trust.
A few interpretations blur the difference between explanation, correlation, and causation.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Good
C.2Personal approach
Good
C.3Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Good
D.2Critical analysis
Good
D.3Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Relevance and level
Moderate
E.2Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3Knowledge and understanding
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.