Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) SL Internal Assessment Example
What is the optimal timing and dosage of paracetamol to maximize its
therapeutic effect?SL
Loading scores...
4
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 4
Criteria A: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Moderate
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student presents a clear investigation topic and keeps the reader oriented with headings, figures, and a recognizable overall structure.
Most of the content stays relevant to the pharmacokinetic context, and the discussion generally follows a logical sequence from data to model to conclusion.
There is repetition in several places, and some explanations add length without adding new insight.
The modelling path becomes less coherent in the later sections, especially where a new starting point is introduced without enough justification.
Some parts of the conclusion do not fully match the earlier analysis, which weakens the flow of the exploration.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2Multiple representations
Moderate
B.3Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses appropriate mathematical terms such as concentration, exponential decay, natural logarithm, and geometric series.
The student includes several useful representations, including tables, graphs, and transformed data, which help show the modelling process.
The student's writing is often clear enough that the reader can see the intended steps in the calculation path.
The notation is not always consistent, especially when variables, units, and transformed quantities are mixed together.
Some graphs and labels are not always presented with enough precision to make the mathematics fully unambiguous.
A few statements use mathematical ideas imprecisely, such as blurring correlation, regression, and model interpretation.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Good
C.2Personal approach
Good
C.3Creativity and initiative
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Poor
D.2Critical analysis
Poor
D.3Connection to understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Relevance and level
Moderate
E.2Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3Knowledge and understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.