Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: To what… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) SL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent does the height (cm) of female National Team Volleyball players affect their spike effectiveness frequency in a 6v6 match in the 2024-25 season?SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's exploration has a clear overall structure that moves logically from context to data, analysis, and conclusion.
The student's sections are easy to follow, and the tables and figures are generally placed where they support the discussion.
Most of the work stays focused on the research question and avoids major digressions.
Some sections are longer than necessary and include detail that does not add much to the argument.
A few transitions and labels are confusing, which makes the flow less seamless than it could be.
There are places where the wording suggests conclusions before the evidence has fully been established.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Good
B.2Multiple representations
Good
B.3Clarity and consistency
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student uses appropriate statistical language such as correlation, quartiles, expected frequencies, and chi-squared.
The student's scatterplot, tables, and calculator outputs give the reader several ways to follow the investigation.
The student's working is usually understandable, and they generally explain what the numbers mean in context.
Some notation is inconsistent or imprecise, which weakens precision.
A few representations could be clearer or better justified, especially where categories are created for the chi-squared test.
There are technical errors in labels and formula presentation that reduce consistency.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Good
C.2Personal approach
Good
C.3Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Good
D.2Critical analysis
Good
D.3Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics (SL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Relevance and level
Excellent
E.2Accuracy and correctness
Good
E.3Knowledge and understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.