Report an issue
Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: To What… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
To What Extent Does Airborne Particulate Density Predict Average Life Expectancy?
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
F
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Moderate
A.2
Organization and structure
Good
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's exploration has a clear overall route from data collection to analysis and conclusion.
The student uses headings, tables, graphs, and appendices in a way that makes the investigation easy to navigate.
Most of the material stays focused on the research question.
Some of the later methods do not grow naturally out of the earlier analysis.
A few sections interrupt the flow, and the numbering and model presentation are not fully consistent.
Several model comparisons feel repetitive rather than selective.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2
Multiple representations
Good
B.3
Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a good range of statistical language such as quartiles, expected frequency, regression equations, and percentage error.
Multiple representations are used effectively, including tables, plots, and model equations.
The main mathematical ideas are usually communicated clearly enough to follow.
Notation is sometimes inconsistent or imprecise.
Some graphs and model displays are not integrated cleanly into the written explanation.
A few labels, intervals, and calculations are presented in ways that make verification difficult.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Poor
C.2
Personal approach
Poor
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Good
D.2
Critical analysis
Good
D.3
Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Use of Mathematics (HL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
F.1
Relevance and level
Moderate
F.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
F.3
Knowledge and understanding
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.