Report an issue
Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
The Perfect Dive: Optimising Goalkeeper Diving Strategy to Save Penalties
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2
Organization and structure
Good
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's report is clearly structured with a strong introduction, developed body, and conclusion.
The mathematical journey is easy to follow because each main stage leads logically into the next.
Most sections stay relevant to the modelling aim and support the investigation well.
Some sections include repetitive or descriptive material that does not add much to the argument.
A few transitions rely on visual impression rather than a fully transparent mathematical method.
The final layout is good, but not consistently seamless because of issues such as a blank page and dense figures.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Good
B.2
Multiple representations
Good
B.3
Clarity and consistency
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a wide range of appropriate mathematical language and symbolism.
Tables, graphs, vectors, matrices, and equations are generally presented clearly.
The student's explanations usually help the reader understand what each result means in context.
Some terminology is imprecise, such as calling a two-dimensional region a surface area.
A few notation choices and angle labels are inconsistent or hard to verify.
Some diagrams are crowded, so the mathematical meaning is not always immediately clear.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Good
C.2
Personal approach
Good
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Good
D.2
Critical analysis
Good
D.3
Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Relevance and level
Good
E.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3
Knowledge and understanding
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.