Report an issue
Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: Solar… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Optimal Placement of Solar Panels for Maximum Efficiency
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
3
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 3
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Moderate
A.2
Organization and structure
Good
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student used a clear overall structure with an introduction, data section, modelling sections, and conclusion.
The student's work follows a recognizable progression from context to modelling to optimization.
Tables and figures are generally placed near the relevant discussion, which helps the reader follow the exploration.
There is substantial background material that does not directly advance the investigation.
The final document is not fully reliable in its pagination and contents-page references.
The conclusion does not resolve the contradictions in the calculated results.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Poor
B.2
Multiple representations
Moderate
B.3
Clarity and consistency
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student used relevant symbols and attempted to apply trigonometric and algebraic notation.
The student included multiple representations such as tables, diagrams, graphs, and equations.
The student's headings and displayed calculations give the reader some way to track the intended process.
Several symbols and angle labels are unclear or used inconsistently.
Some equations are written in a way that makes them difficult to verify.
The mathematical presentation is not consistently accurate, especially in substitutions and final results.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Poor
C.2
Personal approach
Poor
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Poor
D.2
Critical analysis
Poor
D.3
Connection to understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Relevance and level
Poor
E.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3
Knowledge and understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.