Report an issue
Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: Max… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Max Verstappen vs Charles Leclerc at the corner in the F1 circuit
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Moderate
A.2
Organization and structure
Moderate
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student used clear section headings and a recognizable investigation sequence from aim to conclusion.
The student's topic stayed relevant to the research focus and the overall argument was easy to follow in broad outline.
The student included supporting material such as tables and an appendix to show their working.
Large amounts of raw output and screenshot material made the report overly long and repetitive.
Some calculations and conclusions were based on inconsistent bounds, which weakened the flow of the argument.
The organization was functional, but several sections were not tightly controlled or concise enough.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2
Multiple representations
Good
B.3
Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses appropriate mathematical terms such as regression, derivative, definite integral, domain, and units.
Several equations and tables are presented in a readable way, and the student often labels values clearly.
The student makes effective use of different representations, including graphs, fitted models, and numerical summaries.
Some notation is inconsistent or written unclearly, especially where bounds, variables, and conversions are introduced.
A few figures and labels are difficult to verify because the presentation is not fully standardized.
The mathematical writing sometimes mixes prose and equations in a way that reduces clarity.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Good
C.2
Personal approach
Good
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Poor
D.2
Critical analysis
Poor
D.3
Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Relevance and level
Moderate
E.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3
Knowledge and understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.