Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Investigating the most appropriate model for the global plastic production over the years from 1960-2023 and using the model to predict projection for plastic pollution in 2030.HL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student gives the exploration a clear overall structure with a recognizable progression from context to modelling, comparison, and conclusion.
The student's sections generally help the reader follow the investigation, and the main purpose stays visible throughout.
Most of the content stays connected to the topic and supports the modelling task.
Some key time-frame details do not stay consistent across the exploration.
The flow is not always seamless because of repeated labels, formatting issues, and sections that feel appended rather than integrated.
The work contains more repetition and extra material than is needed for a concise investigation.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2Multiple representations
Moderate
B.3Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses appropriate mathematical vocabulary such as regression, derivatives, and fit statistics.
The student includes several useful representations, including tables, graphs, and calculator output.
The student's communication is often understandable, especially when they explain the general purpose of the models and compare their behavior.
Several equations and reported values are written inconsistently, which makes it hard to tell which results are being used.
Some graphs and outputs are not fully labelled or clearly integrated into the discussion.
The communication would be stronger if the notation stayed consistent from one section to the next.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Poor
C.2Personal approach
Poor
C.3Creativity and initiative
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Good
D.2Critical analysis
Good
D.3Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Use of Mathematics (HL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Relevance and level
Good
F.2Accuracy and correctness
Poor
F.3Knowledge and understanding
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.