Report an issue
Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: Pursuit… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Investigating Pursuit Curves in Mathematical Models
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2
Organization and structure
Good
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's exploration has a clear topic, sensible sectioning, and an overall mathematical progression that the reader can follow.
The student uses diagrams, graphs, and tables to support the written work and make the pursuit model more concrete.
The investigation stays mostly focused on the central chase problem, with relevant examples that connect to the main question.
Some parts are repetitive, especially where equations are restated without adding new insight.
The ending is too broad and does not clearly synthesize the key result of the exploration.
A few sections drift away from the main mathematical line of argument, which weakens conciseness.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2
Multiple representations
Good
B.3
Clarity and consistency
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses relevant mathematical language such as coordinates, derivatives, arc length, and integration.
The student's diagrams and graphs support the algebra and help the reader connect symbols to the chase situation.
The student usually introduces equations in prose, which helps the mathematics feel purposeful rather than isolated.
The student's notation is not fully consistent, especially in the definition and later use of the speed ratio.
Some symbols and labels change across the exploration, which makes it harder to track the derivation confidently.
Several results are stated with too little explanation, so the reader has to infer too much of the logic.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Poor
C.2
Personal approach
Poor
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Poor
D.2
Critical analysis
Poor
D.3
Connection to understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Relevance and level
Moderate
E.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
E.3
Knowledge and understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.