Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: How can… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) SL Internal Assessment Example
How can optimization be used to deduce the volume and surface area of Baymax thus using it to reduce production costs and minimize material waste in sustainable toy design?SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Moderate
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student gives the exploration a clear purpose and a recognizable overall structure.
The student's work is generally relevant to the investigation and includes a logical sequence of modelling steps.
The student includes introduction, development, evaluation, and conclusion sections that help the reader follow the argument.
The flow is interrupted by inconsistent dimensions, domains, and scaling choices.
Several headings, figures, and calculations are repeated or not integrated smoothly.
The work is longer than necessary in places, with some repetitive explanation and unfinished derivations.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2Multiple representations
Moderate
B.3Clarity and consistency
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a range of appropriate mathematical vocabulary and ideas such as regression, integration, scaling, and surface area.
The student includes multiple representations, including graphs, diagrams, tables, and 3D visualizations.
The student's notation is often understandable at the level of the investigation, and the reader can usually identify the intended method.
Notation is inconsistent in several places, including incorrect symbols and changing meanings for variables.
Some expressions are malformed, incomplete, or not written in a standard mathematical form.
Figures and calculations are not always connected clearly to the surrounding explanation, which reduces readability.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Good
C.2Personal approach
Good
C.3Creativity and initiative
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Good
D.2Critical analysis
Poor
D.3Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Use of Mathematics (SL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Relevance and level
Good
E.2Accuracy and correctness
Good
E.3Knowledge and understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.