Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) IA Example: Dans… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation (AI) HL Internal Assessment Example
Dans quelle mesure, grâce aux mathématiques, puis-je modéliser la variation de température d’une soupe afin de prédire le temps que j’ai pour la déguster?HL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2Organization and structure
Good
A.3Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's exploration has a clear overall progression from data collection to modelling, interpretation, and conclusion.
The student organizes the work in a way that is easy to follow, with clear sections and a logical sequence.
The student keeps most of the content focused on the investigation and the final question.
Some claims in the conclusion would be stronger if they were supported by numerical evidence rather than description alone.
A few formatting and structure issues interrupt the flow, such as repeated numbering and an extra blank page.
Some lengthy calculations could be moved more fully into the appendix to keep the main argument tighter.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Mathematical language and notation
Good
B.2Multiple representations
Good
B.3Clarity and consistency
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student uses mathematical language and notation appropriately in most places, including regression, logarithms, determinants, and differential equations.
The student includes several clear representations, such as tables, graphs, algebraic work, and the final model.
The student's writing is usually clear enough that the reader can follow the mathematics and the prediction being made.
There are some notation and terminology inconsistencies, especially around the cooling constant and the use of transformed variables.
The graphs would communicate more effectively with clearer labels, legends, and less visual clutter.
A few unit and wording slips reduce precision and make the mathematics less consistent than it should be.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Independent thinking
Good
C.2Personal approach
Good
C.3Creativity and initiative
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Depth of reflection
Good
D.2Critical analysis
Good
D.3Connection to understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Use of Mathematics (HL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Relevance and level
Good
F.2Accuracy and correctness
Moderate
F.3Knowledge and understanding
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.