Report an issue
Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) IA Exemplar: Investigation… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Investigation of the surface area to volume ratio of fusilli pasta
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
F
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Coherence and logical development
Good
A.2
Organization and structure
Good
A.3
Conciseness and relevance
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You present the investigation with a clear overall structure and purposeful headings.
The raw measurements, model-building steps, and final written sections are easy to locate.
Most of the work stays focused on the central fusilli modelling problem and is visually orderly.
Some sections become unnecessarily long and repetitive, especially in the derivation.
The final results are not brought together in a compact comparison table.
A few discussion points drift away from the actual mathematical investigation.
Criteria B: Mathematical Communication
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Mathematical language and notation
Moderate
B.2
Multiple representations
Good
B.3
Logical structure and clarity
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You use a substantial range of mathematical language and notation appropriate to the topic.
Different representations are included, such as tables, photographs, diagrams, and parametrized surfaces.
The derivation is laid out in a mostly sequential way, so the intended method is understandable.
Some notation is used inconsistently, which makes it harder to follow the variables and parameters.
Several formulae change form without enough explanation, weakening clarity.
The final mathematical argument is not always easy to verify because of symbolic and algebraic slips.
Criteria C: Personal Engagement
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Independent thinking
Excellent
C.2
Personal approach
Excellent
C.3
Creativity and initiative
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Reflection
1/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Depth of reflection
Poor
D.2
Critical analysis
Poor
D.3
Evaluation of outcomes
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Use of Mathematics (HL)
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
F.1
Relevance and level
Good
F.2
Accuracy and correctness
Poor
F.3
Knowledge and understanding
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.