Loading document preview...

IB History SL Internal Assessment Exemplar: To what extent did men's attitudes towards women's public roles change in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940?

To what extent did men's attitudes towards women's public roles change in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940?

Overall Score: 17/25

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Identification and evaluation of sources

5/6

Criteria Strands

Excellent

Research question formulation

Excellent

Source selection and relevance

Good

Source analysis and evaluation

Criteria Feedback

Research question is sharply focused, clearly stated with appropriate temporal and geographical scope
Two highly relevant secondary sources are identified with direct explanations of their pertinence to men’s attitudes
Consistent grounding of source selection in the investigation’s aims enhances coherence

Analysis of source value and limitations is relatively brief and lacks deeper comparative evaluation
Limited reflection on how elite bias in sources affects broader representativeness
Bibliographic entries are inconsistent and missing full publication details

Criteria B: Investigation

9/15

Criteria Strands

Moderate

Organization and clarity

Poor

Critical analysis and evidence use

Poor

Perspective evaluation and conclusion

Criteria Feedback

Document structure is clear and coherent, with a logical progression supported by headings and a detailed table of contents
Evidence—both qualitative quotations and quantitative data—is integrated to support claims about changing male attitudes
Instances of critical analysis move beyond description to link evidence back to the research question

Critical analysis is uneven, with lengthy narrative passages that could be more tightly focused
The conclusion asserts change but fails to evaluate alternative perspectives or social-class variations
Occasional digressions and formatting issues (e.g., inappropriate symbols) detract from overall clarity

Criteria C: Reflection

3/4

Criteria Strands

Good

Methods reflection

Good

Historical challenges awareness

Good

Connection to investigation

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Loading scores...

Overall Score: 17/25

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Identification and evaluation of sources

5/6

Criteria Strands

Excellent

Research question formulation

Excellent

Source selection and relevance

Good

Source analysis and evaluation

Criteria Feedback

Research question is sharply focused, clearly stated with appropriate temporal and geographical scope
Two highly relevant secondary sources are identified with direct explanations of their pertinence to men’s attitudes
Consistent grounding of source selection in the investigation’s aims enhances coherence

Analysis of source value and limitations is relatively brief and lacks deeper comparative evaluation
Limited reflection on how elite bias in sources affects broader representativeness
Bibliographic entries are inconsistent and missing full publication details

Criteria B: Investigation

9/15

Criteria Strands

Moderate

Organization and clarity

Poor

Critical analysis and evidence use

Poor

Perspective evaluation and conclusion

Criteria Feedback

Document structure is clear and coherent, with a logical progression supported by headings and a detailed table of contents
Evidence—both qualitative quotations and quantitative data—is integrated to support claims about changing male attitudes
Instances of critical analysis move beyond description to link evidence back to the research question

Critical analysis is uneven, with lengthy narrative passages that could be more tightly focused
The conclusion asserts change but fails to evaluate alternative perspectives or social-class variations
Occasional digressions and formatting issues (e.g., inappropriate symbols) detract from overall clarity

Criteria C: Reflection

3/4

Criteria Strands

Good

Methods reflection

Good

Historical challenges awareness

Good

Connection to investigation

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.