History IA Exemplar: “To what extent did Mao regain his authority in… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB History SL Internal Assessment Example
“To what extent did Mao regain his authority in China between 1966-1976?”SL
Loading scores...
-
Overall Score
18/25
Criteria A: Identification and evaluation of sources
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Research question formulation
Excellent
A.2Source selection and relevance
Excellent
A.3Source analysis and evaluation
Good
Criteria Feedback
Your research question is focused, historically appropriate, and clearly framed around a genuine judgement.
You selected two relevant sources with contrasting perspectives that both connect well to the issue of Mao’s authority.
You show real awareness of source value and limitation, especially by considering origin, purpose, and retrospective bias.
You could define key terms such as “authority” more precisely so the inquiry is even sharper.
Some source justifications stay a little general and could explain more specifically what each source contributes to the question.
Your evaluation of the second source is not quite as explicit or detailed as the strongest source analysis requires.
Criteria B: Investigation
11/15
0
8
15
Criteria Strands
B.1Organization and clarity
Good
B.2Critical analysis and evidence use
Moderate
B.3Perspective evaluation and conclusion
Good
Criteria Feedback
Your investigation has a clear structure and stays organized around a direct line of argument.
You use evidence from multiple historians and sources to support a sustained claim about how Mao regained authority.
You include counterarguments and reach a reasoned conclusion that directly answers the question.
Some claims are stronger than the evidence shown, especially where you imply a direct transfer of authority or rely on later events to support earlier claims.
At times the analysis becomes a little repetitive or imprecise, which weakens the clarity of the argument.
Your comparison of different historical interpretations could be more explicit and more consistently developed.
Criteria C: Reflection
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
C.1Methods reflection
Excellent
C.2Historical challenges awareness
Excellent
C.3Connection to investigation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.