To what extent can the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) be conclusively held responsible for the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana in April 1994?SL
Loading scores...
-
Overall Score
17/25
Criteria A: Identification and evaluation of sources
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Research question formulation
Excellent
A.2Source selection and relevance
Excellent
A.3Source analysis and evaluation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- You stated a focused, historically relevant question that is clearly investigable.
- You chose two relevant and contrasting sources that speak directly to the dispute.
- You evaluated both sources with attention to origin, purpose, and content.
- You showed awareness of each source’s value and limitations rather than simply describing them.
- Some evaluative claims rely too much on reputation or institutional status.
- A few criticisms would be stronger if they were supported with more precise evidence from the sources themselves.
- The distinction between a source reporting findings and a source proving a historical claim needs to be sharper in places.
Criteria B: Investigation
10/15
0
8
15
Criteria Strands
B.1Organization and clarity
Good
B.2Critical analysis and evidence use
Good
B.3Perspective evaluation and conclusion
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Your investigation is clearly structured and easy to follow.
- You move beyond narration by testing claims through motive, capacity, bias, and evidential strength.
- You engage with more than one perspective and reach a reasoned conclusion that fits the evidence you discuss.
- You use a reasonably wide range of evidence types, including scholarly work, reports, testimony, and investigations.
- Some paragraphs repeat the same general point about the lack of forensic proof or possible bias.
- At times you describe a source as questionable without fully explaining the specific methodological reason.
- The argument would be stronger if you compared the evidential weight of the claims more directly and ranked the strongest evidence.
Criteria C: Reflection
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
C.1Methods reflection
Good
C.2Historical challenges awareness
Good
C.3Connection to investigation
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.