Global Politics IA Exemplar: Women in Costa Rica STEM Discrimination | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB Global Politics SL Internal Assessment Example

To what extent do women in Costa Rica face discrimination, including sexism, pay inequity, and the undermining of their skills, in the STEM industry, and what initiatives or policies are being implemented within the workforce to address these challenges?SL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: 6

Criteria A: A: Identification of issue and justification

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Identification of issue and justification

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

The student states a clear and focused political issue from the start.
The student's personal connection to the topic is genuine and well explained.
The student connects the topic convincingly to power, inequality, rights, and representation in Global Politics.
The student's rationale shows why the issue matters beyond their own interest.

The student could separate structural, cultural, and workplace causes more precisely.
Some contextual claims would be stronger with tighter sourcing and more exact wording.

Criteria B: B: Explanation of the engagement

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Explanation of the engagement

Good

Criteria Feedback

The student describes a range of relevant engagement activities, including a survey, an interview, an exhibition, and an awareness article.
The student's engagement choices are clearly tied to the issue and are not generic.
The student shows that the activities produced real information about workplace experiences, representation, and discrimination.
The student goes beyond listing activities by noting some of the insights they gained from them.

The student's reflection is sometimes more descriptive than reflective.
The student does not always explain clearly how the experiences changed or deepened their political understanding.
Some findings are noted without fully exploring what they mean for the broader issue.

Criteria C: C: Analysis of issue

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Analysis of issue

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: D: Synthesis and evaluation

3/6

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Synthesis and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: 6

Criteria A: A: Identification of issue and justification

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Identification of issue and justification

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

The student states a clear and focused political issue from the start.
The student's personal connection to the topic is genuine and well explained.
The student connects the topic convincingly to power, inequality, rights, and representation in Global Politics.
The student's rationale shows why the issue matters beyond their own interest.

The student could separate structural, cultural, and workplace causes more precisely.
Some contextual claims would be stronger with tighter sourcing and more exact wording.

Criteria B: B: Explanation of the engagement

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Explanation of the engagement

Good

Criteria Feedback

The student describes a range of relevant engagement activities, including a survey, an interview, an exhibition, and an awareness article.
The student's engagement choices are clearly tied to the issue and are not generic.
The student shows that the activities produced real information about workplace experiences, representation, and discrimination.
The student goes beyond listing activities by noting some of the insights they gained from them.

The student's reflection is sometimes more descriptive than reflective.
The student does not always explain clearly how the experiences changed or deepened their political understanding.
Some findings are noted without fully exploring what they mean for the broader issue.

Criteria C: C: Analysis of issue

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Analysis of issue

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: D: Synthesis and evaluation

3/6

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Synthesis and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.